[Cfrg] Pending CFRG actions / priorities

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Tue, 23 December 2014 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F3F1A1A92 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:18:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WGSZ-DkXZoj2 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:18:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from statler.isode.com (ext-bt.isode.com [217.34.220.158]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9911A03A8 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:18:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1419358705; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=X5tkvA908hpsRmYSgAfctW7IiYvfKOhtIHJNyGk/ajs=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=ZF4nz6mN5G37KuGFal+CG4KE45eC0FtU+Z6S0L5naYRPiMWY9yELI65CsS0QIW2cJQ80Rr 7KfRF37MDeVUOYz8Li1FjBlQgK4dfYO0xMEHQEB0Iqay67LG36x6LA683YjHGLKw+dFl4D HVTCV7Q9Ut2k9cpFQXjp5bz8zBv4RjY=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <VJmx7wBz6WeA@statler.isode.com>; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:18:25 +0000
Message-ID: <5499B1C0.1000303@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:17:36 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
References: <548EC71E.8090101@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <548EC71E.8090101@isode.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------060505090205020409020500"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/ZirXNTBBTNhDntOv5GzdAIrJnKk
Subject: [Cfrg] Pending CFRG actions / priorities
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:18:29 -0000

Dear CFRG participants,
There was some positive feedback to the idea of publishing what chairs 
think are CFRG priorities and who is waiting for what. This should also 
help with transparency.

Also in the last week chairs have received lots of private emails about 
what they think chairs should do, accusing other participants and CFRG 
chairs for all kind of actions and inactions. For every email chairs 
write they seem to get 2 or 3 back, so please bear with us.

Best Regards,
Alexey, on behalf of chairs