[Cfrg] New names for draft-ladd-safecurves

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Tue, 21 January 2014 03:17 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7045D1A0027 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:17:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OldjymPXAilg for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:17:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x230.google.com (mail-we0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9F91A0024 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:17:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id t61so3166441wes.21 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:17:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=a+j2g76PQF1FkL25xcfuLHXghDwepbF2tqD3Nvj7GU0=; b=sBTJdIBC899asriODQUR79WKn0EFXOnRA+hxPIYQ5uIs2Q7ujGtxMqAUL1cwT6Wfm4 SfzEHsuN5QE4DACL6PXpHuqI+HWWUeGvbtkf4pNi30I/RwX8LkLrnBCH0BJnO6S5G05e lkJjLRdEqOwxNc8ttzjphgDKUyxxO3To2GXN91H3KqvQWkXiztsXB4qbXFUc/5m76dBQ sKy7p6yZbMB0xWPBxiWjZ+GV21DTYNcz4NxrggIIye90x0biw9MF7fofknbYG+hF7GKp nOhKdf5oCjbaKpvrE5LinIWhou5u/w96vCcKu6sHpgqho7TRXtgyMuPQuYPJRojWF4d0 OkxQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.149.175 with SMTP id ub15mr12540845wib.44.1390274245578; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:17:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.250.101 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:17:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:17:25 -0800
Message-ID: <CACsn0ck02mnETBUfuyJjLV9K8Yuiki8_-RG0tVszL8BDhkK27w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: [Cfrg] New names for draft-ladd-safecurves
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 03:17:27 -0000

I am proposing that we name the curves with the following scheme: E,
M, TE, indicating
the curve type, followed by a prime designator. The prime designator
will be the concatination
of the numbers a and b such that 2^a-b=p if such a and b exist and are
small. Otherwise I'll think of something (Ed448 Goldilocks I'm looking
at you).

Any objections? Or do we have consensus on this change, and I was just
to dense to notice?

A new version with significant alterations will be hitting the draft
server in a few days.

Sincerely,
Watson Ladd