Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision?
Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Mon, 06 October 2014 23:28 UTC
Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B4E1A904F for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zzr66Dngnst2 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22f.google.com (mail-yk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50B9A1A904E for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 19so2402925ykq.34 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vINgDq6xRSfHEg4neGmE2KMjXvSlWzql+Lzpi1yDKI0=; b=l5V1Ld5YFrHtrSJ+wmzLGgyFVPk8NxKmcZi0dqT2Qdp8LR/Q8ztFQgM7M9tCrb8TZW y5jqruFJWMDtt94Hl5dW8OgGMU42AQOzgizKCVb4ddHsoyLCnK4K3ZUaC75T0xXCncu+ z5yr8HjpenLzY/1+cztkr9J1Lb9eQ1YUISVZ02d80+gj8TvouYCGKwkWAmGJ1jb1mvJj v8pU3UDtderrn3gKXUNwcCuZBZGRIPrwulSKgkhUjB/yCUicX61g+Y3DOQ8YkcIY4lPe 9yer/7hFeuhksdJZcmeQLj2UsLDyKYkTcFC9grJD/HzJP7pULuL1epLhxnRtAm2nx9+I Ay6g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.94.130 with SMTP id n2mr7920822yhf.163.1412638082435; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.170.195.149 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.170.195.149 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 16:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5432BBF1.5060003@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <CACsn0cnHDc6_jWf1mXc5kQgj5XEc6dBBZa7K8D2=4uLti5e3aA@mail.gmail.com> <3EE5AEA5-3ADE-4D67-AC51-478074349D1B@gmail.com> <5432BBF1.5060003@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:28:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0cmwJh295=R8Ns3Y01UTLBwoQAg5g_PB=yN6nJUCYxgqnw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf3011e19519907e0504c96f75"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/_orTrpwk1A-CNYuNBSUixGGpgWg
Cc: cfrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision?
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 23:28:05 -0000
On Oct 6, 2014 8:57 AM, "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > > Hiya, > > On 06/10/14 16:53, Yoav Nir wrote: > > They’re all good enough > > Tend to agree. But CFRG, pretty-please don't pick them all! This ignores the significance of choices such as which coordinates to use on the wire, whether to use compression, and which signature scheme to use. These are not make or break items, and any curve could be used several ways, but these issues do not go away with the choice of curve. > > If you do we'll just have to pick elsewhere (e.g. saag or > specific IETF wgs) with less clue immediately involved. Agreed: the buck stops here. > > S. >
- [Cfrg] When's the decision? Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Yoav Nir
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? David Jacobson
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? David Jacobson
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? D. J. Bernstein
- [Cfrg] Publicly verifiable benchmarks D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Parkinson, Sean
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Parkinson, Sean
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Mike Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Parkinson, Sean
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Mike Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Parkinson, Sean
- Re: [Cfrg] Publicly verifiable benchmarks David Jacobson
- Re: [Cfrg] Publicly verifiable benchmarks Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] Publicly verifiable benchmarks Andrey Jivsov
- Re: [Cfrg] Publicly verifiable benchmarks Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Publicly verifiable benchmarks Parkinson, Sean
- Re: [Cfrg] Publicly verifiable benchmarks D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] Publicly verifiable benchmarks Michael Hamburg
- [Cfrg] Constant-time implementations D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] Constant-time implementations David Jacobson
- Re: [Cfrg] Constant-time implementations Adam Langley
- Re: [Cfrg] Constant-time implementations Yoav Nir
- Re: [Cfrg] Constant-time implementations Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Constant-time implementations Mike Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Parkinson, Sean
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [Cfrg] When's the decision? Yoav Nir
- [Cfrg] ed448goldilocks vs. numsp384t1 and numsp51… D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] ed448goldilocks vs. numsp384t1 and num… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [Cfrg] ed448goldilocks vs. numsp384t1 and num… Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] ed448goldilocks vs. numsp384t1 and num… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [Cfrg] ed448goldilocks vs. numsp384t1 and num… Michael Hamburg