[CFRG] Proposed resolution for erratum 5930 on RFC 8032
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Fri, 15 January 2021 17:39 UTC
Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5564F3A0EE1
for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 09:39:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id R7vPiAViMu9B for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 15 Jan 2021 09:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from statler.isode.com (Statler.isode.com [62.232.206.189])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3694C3A0ECB
for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 09:39:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1610732384;
d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com;
bh=pDoRx69yxbAyLAZr1HjN2B1ySGofytqXhkORJtOeYHo=;
h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:
In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:
Content-ID:Content-Description;
b=prFqlvG8CFK+xlph0fvtBBEHWRrjP/Mh7EBf4ly6SossRqhpzioyZ5GfeiIuFPGPT1SnHj
8h+WYa1HeIJumzUQGQjBrej/YL0o/6Me9JDt3KZEejMAxNW7VrNJfYe6OUG26drMK6Etjt
d0+v1Kp+UUcsUjp7VvOe219DmVstgBY=;
Received: from [172.27.249.250] (connect.isode.net [172.20.0.72])
by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA
id <YAHTXwBqmhOd@statler.isode.com>; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:39:43 +0000
To: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>,
Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <42fdca41-bfdd-9d75-b144-0e2f3b5fa1d9@isode.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:39:22 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/_xne3cnOFyZf48ANwRMMrQ_kVJo>
Subject: [CFRG] Proposed resolution for erratum 5930 on RFC 8032
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>,
<mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>,
<mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:39:46 -0000
Dear CFRG (and editors), Daniel Bleichenbacher submitted the following editorial erratum on RFC 8032 ("Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)") Section 6 says: OLD: def verify(public, msg, signature): if len(public) != 32: raise Exception("Bad public key length") if len(signature) != 64: Exception("Bad signature length") It should say: def verify(public, msg, signature): if len(public) != 32: raise Exception("Bad public key length") if len(signature) != 64: raise Exception("Bad signature length") Note: Missing raise before Exception ------------------- This is indeed looks like a Python syntax error. So I propose to resolve this erratum as suggested by Daniel. Please provide your feedback by the end of January 29th. Best Regards, Alexey, as a co-chair
- [CFRG] Proposed resolution for erratum 5930 on RF… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [CFRG] Proposed resolution for erratum 5930 o… Simon Josefsson
- Re: [CFRG] Proposed resolution for erratum 5930 o… Mike Hamburg
- Re: [CFRG] Proposed resolution for erratum 5930 o… Ilari Liusvaara