Re: [CFRG] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves

Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Mon, 06 September 2021 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1083A0A69 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 06:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=csperkins.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NdBWa2MVj1K6 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 06:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haggis.mythic-beasts.com (haggis.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:86:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A036E3A0A65 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 06:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=csperkins.org; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=To:Date:Subject:From; bh=qvMXwlDzEWJMgOuOkCEwsvClZfN//ZRHB5cFzdst8TY=; b=Qv1HEm/5Akg8dVPru+wFYju9W4 kgnNuiKdG/b+0ZAHAKdASE9eIQZ0RbcwvoTk216lB5F7b1UhhVZl6lLo3Btcm2RbBVjRQneVemSCC Kk7VE1It/JxJlgICtN5zUcSyY9pEbFZWr2LHDJO0yAhM/f4HJthITXDeftT4JFu7+w6TJQVfuxQA1 nL8/RfaziczM7ocMI3JIxCQJ3WmQoyV3+TyZdxlh+fBUfzTI/AIp7WNhZyQCt+ztebYMB2ke+CqXy POvZJqCILXhBTAkO2oWePoBq8i5FoRXHHAaNpzIXY7/bw46opIfUSDf6fx0uMZnnms2OnWwnMRCm9 3teEpqnw==;
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=42643 helo=[192.168.0.83]) by haggis.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1mNEYL-0003eZ-M5; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 14:20:49 +0100
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Message-Id: <6B079E60-5A57-444B-A620-E85A163CFEF8@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_39FCCF6B-9571-4B05-B379-67B9AEB59E76"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 14:20:39 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAEseHRp=arSCUtFb5orJ2pVyWU08_FWgnm2y_DeNKnTHU6XNRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>, CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
To: Michael Scott <mike.scott=40miracl.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <CAMr0u6kV-YsAuAMRh6OVArhZ6DftZSCumqYNOQQ5BWq0cgxW3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAEseHRp=arSCUtFb5orJ2pVyWU08_FWgnm2y_DeNKnTHU6XNRQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 14
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/a939WLk3IA8cKZxPhZ7BW2eHvXo>
Subject: Re: [CFRG] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 13:20:59 -0000

To clarify, since this issue comes up frequently: the CFRG is an IRTF research group, and does not develop standards. 

The pairing friendly curves draft is targeting publication as an Informational RFC.

Colin



> On 6 Sep 2021, at 08:41, Michael Scott <mike.scott=40miracl.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I would like to reiterate my support for this proposed standard. The authors have diligently responded to earlier feedback, the pairing-friendly curves proposed have not received any substantive criticism, and in some cases have already been widely adopted. Therefore in my view this draft standard is ready to progress.
> 
> Mike Scott
> 
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 4:40 PM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com <mailto:smyshsv@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Dear CFRG participants,
> 
> This message starts a second RGLC on "Pairing-Friendly Curves" (draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves-10), that will end on September, 8th.
> 
> See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-pairing-friendly-curves/> for the latest version of the draft.
> 
> We are having the second RGLC since Yumi Sakemi has provided (see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/-1nTbbVRlkP5wV2odEYFac-jK08/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/-1nTbbVRlkP5wV2odEYFac-jK08/>) updated replies for the questions raised after the first RGLC.
> 
> Please send your comments, as well as expression of support to publish as an RFC (or possible reasons for not doing so) in reply to this message or directly to CFRG chairs.
> 
> Regards,
> Stanislav, Nick and Alexey
> _______________________________________________
> CFRG mailing list
> CFRG@irtf.org <mailto:CFRG@irtf.org>
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>
> _______________________________________________
> CFRG mailing list
> CFRG@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg


-- 
Colin Perkins
https://csperkins.org/