Re: [Cfrg] No CFRG meeting in Honolulu

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Mon, 13 October 2014 17:50 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645FA1A6EE7 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.786
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.786 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6jwjdU8YrbH0 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (ext-bt.isode.com [217.34.220.158]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1681A6EE6 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 10:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1413222614; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=q/YADumKP6scVjmsErX8IkeQ3naUW16YaL+WO5bGHUM=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=b/xWtu/55OISMKrMs9QLmLh4aJ5S2t+FNTKzL0eJfwj3lftPJYXO7dYcCSpMwtgMLuGciu yaLZetcncUgN3xTxL7Bx6GwISdru2xDdi60dCldTflBuNYlQg0EcycfhDHNLQuTZmu6HiG EJRRfEvT3L1WHNmQjjS8GicnPLOnR4M=;
Received: from [172.20.1.47] (dhcp-47.isode.net [172.20.1.47]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <VDwQ0gBwWIEL@waldorf.isode.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 18:50:13 +0100
Message-ID: <543C10E5.90302@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 18:50:29 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
References: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739439BB0974B@TK5EX14MBXC286.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <543BFCA9.6070509@isode.com> <CAMm+Lwg8MKbKNufUU+n+Uq941DRy-Q31om9w=AuvE-NhRj8OMg@mail.gmail.com> <543BFF97.9000805@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <543BFF97.9000805@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/b5xJTFEvBA73pGVSg_LTNPu9Ziw
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] No CFRG meeting in Honolulu
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 17:50:22 -0000

On 13/10/2014 17:36, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> This is somewhat surprising to me given all the discussions on this list.
>
> What was the reason for deciding not to meet?
People who can make ECC discussion productive will not be able to make 
it to Honolulu.
> I am hoping to see a lot of progress and face-to-face time is one way to
> make that progress happen.