IETF Logo Mail Archive

[CFRG] Re: Is it appropriate for an RFC to mention specific projects or companies?

Christopher Patton <cpatton@cloudflare.com> Fri, 02 August 2024 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <cpatton@cloudflare.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764A7C1D6FAF for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 09:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7I-8m_onZ3Z3 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 09:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com (mail-qt1-x830.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 261C3C1D4A8E for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 09:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4503ccbc218so29578891cf.1 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 09:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google09082023; t=1722616664; x=1723221464; darn=irtf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vV2ugVjC3HzVpVL/Yp7Urt1ldsKm5fzfZwO8dQqhUB0=; b=TQskEQdfmgeDoRV4sn0TEAeHzmJkJFdg7qDgRsSPmS52dgIAMTAv4Wl81Yut2GWpmp yhWOmR0bNSVyq39AQV/0eCFbHFdvjG2rAIVTaNOtR7GSybpShwpe9cXmGgQZ5QWpxwyC LpvxC7vSg/bgBBR2TS2xE573iCcbM590K972FIVBiv/F/5JYXK1ivozKao5PPBGhmNNd fu8Nvwjkf6jBG7fgTry8WlYdDHtYxlofNtWSavfPrNwFQEWGd3zl6LD7WPBRB8BSnEL3 IeGFT9/p+0pB/qhXA9NvOXRMjJm+MejfiZcM+1JjsOwrjG6hcjONtLUoBeEIx0eGxkfw fjLQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722616664; x=1723221464; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vV2ugVjC3HzVpVL/Yp7Urt1ldsKm5fzfZwO8dQqhUB0=; b=pgjQq50vw26y2s34Op4BanvFQ/Czp3x7tMEij53/AonUZuGPoEgcgiBwQdsM9cGJ4F +n8yYzuE+5d3SC9qc7IqWCmabf9WGGd5B5Sm9U/JhIYK0VXZXN2KcaSPDTxuAg0V9JVa CIAsupO+MSG0JDI9OuuWgEBZbcuZ49n5nvxCWy6KwfTKyPlM8MtFjqN1M16cT53iHSb3 4oxWshKg4MdipJBLFxFQlbMFM/KjOC5maPPzk92r0v3C8GYuuVcP4LCuva8fL0P4b14r rUBfZifLLstpuoDKNYZtNNxnanm4DBVab5zuxaaQ9rKor77J6I79CCzIrb/cDt6BnKUR enOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwWmkgPeyoqkjC9cDCaUYdy+rA6+serKEtt86ADl1TeSMvDZC59 lt75MAXpcYZZ4lj0fvjpGcP+q61K4xsEI5LVeiCwdTCvNHULpH3wRQM9EZrXeu8TmeI1ITjuVFc JLiRzXucD0AwrdLF3MS3S6HcKXsgwvkayn0WDT5Fti4LUIUfX
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEwjeoTsHFG0rzd5WCQshaSkY6/03ukEbXLXsVrV7TkBY9fZXAeMQhG4b6/9bUki20lW7oojFJGpd14XXtFJlU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:507:b0:44f:f271:af63 with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-451845e9ec8mr80800201cf.21.1722616663998; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 09:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAG2Zi22KO6=mDwbKHMvmh+DYkEqNbtBcGO==cNC2c_pcV1xwtg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG2Zi22KO6=mDwbKHMvmh+DYkEqNbtBcGO==cNC2c_pcV1xwtg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Patton <cpatton@cloudflare.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 09:37:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG2Zi224rPat83barP3LeBMvCjfKCk3jXnTMh4UnqP26=0FLcQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000057a6be061eb5f225"
Message-ID-Hash: 2WELR6BHHTHV3WUNNFVERZZTOESU3ZJT
X-Message-ID-Hash: 2WELR6BHHTHV3WUNNFVERZZTOESU3ZJT
X-MailFrom: cpatton@cloudflare.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cfrg.irtf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [CFRG] Re: Is it appropriate for an RFC to mention specific projects or companies?
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/bT8eF74C68TmvSGPQKhyTciY7EU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cfrg-owner@irtf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cfrg-join@irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cfrg-leave@irtf.org>

Thanks all for the feedback!

On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 1:07 PM Christopher Patton <cpatton@cloudflare.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for advice on how to close this open issue for
> draft-irtf-cfrg-vdaf:
> https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-vdaf/issues/338
>
> We currently mention a couple projects that motivated us to write down
> these algorithms. Are there any guidelines at IRTF or IETF that can help us
> figure out if this is appropriate?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris P.
>

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status