IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 11 March 2019 01:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB20F12EB11; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.234
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.234 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KHOP_DYNAMIC=1.468, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n9vE4ygaCtNB; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E055712D4ED; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x2B1c6uK029805; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 01:38:19 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=RfF10QA223C5XYyuHCVjX8KMpzpGaybqZOsY/wc7k88=; b=XzNlKla4nSXMB6lYjsQG695Inc+nbSFi1pEtGu08xSZsx0TrfkVAPY2l37jv2E2DwUET LT2aGgpkjxl//pB/+w7zbVTn3IDDtCa0p6FENZ8pAGG5rHD47JozUUJt86eLy3ESVvfY 4uvEgjCoDzNw6ME0UxwOdlBfpdrpQWEAvd3dxb2rcC11sXrQfjQs5Rz+V6NOR9RrWDwt 2WkjmuA+uuBDvxFr9EhfEams9FPnTMwMAxoWzyqF92Gk1Ym24KwML97JVAQdodQk8i9b dzeQkSHkq59XArKHm56Kxh7BwnHqS1WznPdCkv6DQqFQaOQHpkY3TT4VtI1Cs3AF1ske WA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (a96-6-114-86.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [96.6.114.86] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2r43ej716r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Mar 2019 01:38:18 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x2B1VocE028693; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 21:38:17 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.27.21]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2r49q0pgj3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 10 Mar 2019 21:38:17 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.101) by ustx2ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:38:11 -0700
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.003; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:38:11 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org>
CC: "sec-ads@ietf.org" <sec-ads@ietf.org>, "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>, "rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts
Thread-Index: AQHU1sSh5Bp4IJfpFEWgtYnjGORBDqYFuWUA
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 01:38:10 +0000
Message-ID: <CBD10ADF-4A64-4EF9-A516-CD63BF004536@akamai.com>
References: <1d8de489fc976b63a911573300a431d4.squirrel@www.amsl.com> <EDCE0340-E79A-4464-B4A6-F539C694601C@akamai.com> <B536DE62-B202-4484-91AE-DDF7C3DD9503@gmail.com> <F5A25573-D7B5-4F0A-AE7A-7ACF9D613C9C@ericsson.com> <CAHOTMVJSazerng82T7LGZqQ9H5ODrLOacKKYMXrqGYJ42sDm+A@mail.gmail.com> <38FEBE5B-B60E-49DD-B048-A8A08EBF7FB4@azet.org> <C99F53D2-FC9C-468E-BB02-2BE4B4BDE7A7@azet.org> <F6D6DE1B-DAD9-4F91-9420-B32F7DAC1C56@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <F6D6DE1B-DAD9-4F91-9420-B32F7DAC1C56@vpnc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.17.0.190303
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.41.106]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <2E1A07EE9FB43649AD4D59C31B212C89@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-03-10_20:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=597 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903110009
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-03-11_02:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=617 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903110010
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/bYZfyd1sqBpfn-pzng0qFyVyTmo>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 01:38:22 -0000

>    The answer to "is TLS 1.3 (a standard) using OCB3 (no a standard) a 
    standards-track protocol" is not obvious. Well, some people would say it 
    is obvious, but would disagree on the value of the boolean response.
  
Any codepoints for those ciphers will got an "N" in the recommended  column, because the definitions are part of a standards-track RFC.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email