IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] Adoption call for draft-hoffman-c2pq-02

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sat, 10 February 2018 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD16C12DA0A for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:46:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jS6_xZBGHR_i for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:46:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B321124D6C for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:46:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C87BBE38; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 15:46:20 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NOduix1cy01f; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 15:46:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.244.2.138] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF030BE2F; Sat, 10 Feb 2018 15:46:17 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1518277578; bh=GiBQqRb3YGfqucIgl4yKKVSJL5PeLVvgGIBbsUBtH10=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=oNXjHWNyrEYHWjodKbMi+o4DmN9K9BiPVaWkyo8d9ACXTyt7Kx2eM4e9RPy5Sr+zC J4XS9M3AsBfa10iTF0P+uf596uIOO/J0+hq66mjuDcyvLQVVt8Hcgaec69zX8H+zfo GAU+W/DPfhBbjfS3lVU8Sn1BvVf+015uJ9/SNP/w=
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
References: <5A7F0202.3050801@isode.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=5BB5A6EA5765D2C5863CAE275AB2FAF17B172BEA; url=
Message-ID: <04430647-d1a7-77af-475d-6e89f44e55c8@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 15:46:09 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5A7F0202.3050801@isode.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4LKnJiCW7qobMwqXAOkD6QeODChCxteaj"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/cxZ_0ZKjOGuZT9aRD17qIvfjbzo>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Adoption call for draft-hoffman-c2pq-02
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 15:46:26 -0000


On 10/02/18 14:30, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Dear CFRG participants,
> Based on interest in this topic/document during IETF 100 in Singapore
> (and based on earlier discussions), CFRG Chairs are asking for any
> objections to adopting "The Transition from Classical to Post-Quantum
> Cryptography" (draft-hoffman-c2pq-02) as a CFRG document.
> 
> Please send your comments by February 24th.

I'm not sure if this is worthwhile, but it might be. The
probability that it ends up with something that's not
worth publishing as an RFC seems fairly high to me.

So long as adoption doesn't mean a commitment to eventual
publication of an RFC on this topic, then I don't object.
If the chairs consider adoption is such a commitment then
I would be against that.

Cheers,
S.


> 
> Thank you,
> Kenny and Alexey
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cfrg mailing list
> Cfrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> 

-- 
PGP key change time for me.
New-ID 7B172BEA; old-ID 805F8DA2 expires Jan 24 2018.
NewWithOld sigs in keyservers.
Sorry if that mucks something up;-)

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status