Re: [Cfrg] Review of draft-arciszewski-xchacha-02
Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> Tue, 18 December 2018 16:13 UTC
Return-Path: <krose@krose.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031BA130EE3 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:13:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=krose.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dcfLZk-hU6wM for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:13:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw1-xc34.google.com (mail-yw1-xc34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC7D1130E85 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:13:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw1-xc34.google.com with SMTP id r130so6875833ywg.7 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:13:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krose.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uB6rH5GE7Ut8ocC/D4YPcAi4RZ6fDv3bG9VWsuB/26A=; b=BwQ3kpayWiaFJ29Vpx2ITVogmT6r0L3mfQjkeUiRvsRTCWR9hnT25NHtPIYFvLWOK3 WLesGM7GbMiZ0kcSpQXScVW7f1AaM/IHcUjUhfeDhhXwp/ebBqHFuonIgHuewCTrr5qT z1T5TPBQBzUU05tGIvdHNZoCgcGXEKWF7z/vo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uB6rH5GE7Ut8ocC/D4YPcAi4RZ6fDv3bG9VWsuB/26A=; b=Do803yDmSWTOzqSjDBJcsnIMpaF1b2hLKvj12g6mUBz7k2z7Ak2q/TeP5ai1T2DqZZ cmhPReMEjFlVCzas4NOy0zYr0Rmdm5tLSqtikx4UILpnln8U5nGvfv9kaEntG4py069t X+6ErnZvT26wlnq/qx6A5DThO6H01Tqos0KlLC6lGTE4vjlVkwcJKr/crqA0tkxeOY4I 9YYjfu9nrgiajm6BXDaqN8EijhCRqF611EzUVuw8sfAm1csLz3Brme9IWyO157AJnKA3 Wa/MauPoK+LEg6/kRRq+80/3nz0gVJ5vOZGxQVj9DeaBkOQ18IbOC2m0NPEYu9QFHB5U gwsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWY5Ul/giC8Dln4LFy64fty26FukO1dAqoIb1uJEQQg0Gw25tYLP FDYVUOlpZsZTbok2belUHq3dp2GmTUMNSzzLi2BFpQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UxOdyaoqhFuV7MmI5rQe9s91OukuRX+gjMUQDzBemeotcxo+/VOM6n6ieVulEL2qUDCOvfePyB5cjhw5Ua+FM=
X-Received: by 2002:a81:4e46:: with SMTP id c67mr17496427ywb.314.1545149604775; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 08:13:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <99CCB4A1-9CC1-4611-95C5-CEEA985024F8@gmail.com> <600285EA-7387-4455-9D7F-9FD42AB26920@akamai.com> <CAE_Hg6aU337JAOKaxWdO9z-jwp622kpMR0QcVnwZPSJ-AWrtVA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE_Hg6aU337JAOKaxWdO9z-jwp622kpMR0QcVnwZPSJ-AWrtVA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:13:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJU8_nW9RoHoMLK2Thoge-Rj5ERMUF11AJb2851862bcO5F=iA@mail.gmail.com>
To: _@lvh.io
Cc: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>, cfrg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000516070057d4e2df7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/dDU5VBtoonz2WuvbipU1kr1rFTk>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Review of draft-arciszewski-xchacha-02
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 16:13:28 -0000
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 9:50 AM Laurens Van Houtven <_@lvh.io> wrote: > Just another voice for an argument I'm sure has been made before: I agree > with the original spec, the best possible name is XChaCha20 and not > XNChaCha20 or whatever. Here's why: > > - XSalsa20 already exists. > This was exactly the point I was going to make. Whether or not it's ideal nomenclature, it's established and understandable to everyone with enough context to care what XChaCha is. (Also, "There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation and naming things.") Kyle
- [Cfrg] Review of draft-arciszewski-xchacha-02 Neil Madden
- Re: [Cfrg] Review of draft-arciszewski-xchacha-02 Salz, Rich
- Re: [Cfrg] Review of draft-arciszewski-xchacha-02 Laurens Van Houtven
- Re: [Cfrg] Review of draft-arciszewski-xchacha-02 Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] Review of draft-arciszewski-xchacha-02 Kyle Rose
- Re: [Cfrg] Review of draft-arciszewski-xchacha-02 Scott Arciszewski