Re: [Cfrg] KangarooTwelve draft has been updated to 01
David Wong <davidwong.crypto@gmail.com> Mon, 22 January 2018 15:20 UTC
Return-Path: <davidwong.crypto@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7BB12426E for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 07:20:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B7kuDdRI2Uvp for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 07:20:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x231.google.com (mail-qt0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CB4B127698 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 07:20:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x231.google.com with SMTP id l20so20243638qtj.11 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 07:20:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BuPNCYtUgLkH3PIINDmQqjRoJUJnOLKWs7HVWsCUMGI=; b=rZBv1JA3vckXDqpcKWLvSJAAE/iV8ba8Heq5WmquAgYXjwkZw0yAWjMswM4b7fw2l6 4Ad99uCiP2rERe/Yum6/8l2rZ0IXKcJXJLHU3Xe0bQgRR9Dl9bJeC5+I3T3PfkE36clV gxmB1ouTguRulciy6N5CTsTXOF5J/hHMCGiJhSXA2Wz8p4IQMuh3PJBMkt32CsRuxkUI E9oEUgZ5J2MzqhaNToEa7GffBi0ShZ5qP50Tgkt5yE9jDbVWMdC03mtn3M6ktOVh+jOc E2O/T+BXFyIhsoza8pvNY9jq1NnF7NzCUB92IdsNwuXfqJoYvYNO0WkSTkefXXyKUrne 1Csw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BuPNCYtUgLkH3PIINDmQqjRoJUJnOLKWs7HVWsCUMGI=; b=Fg2LyrbcYBKyOxZ5RzCntCrE1oDhnUpRWEIS4ji4DNGMfT4tw0K4o/KZN4EOqzvs8s MymggN/xyhN+9zMbnb2bIREYWSM1bZn0X/Lyb7aSwNDoo1qUUK0qZU76TLQuKOMdFMam cp3LEKop1mVvHSnfY79k4mBL194q629LItx39rUvCGYXymMfHoEIo2Hk4jR8ENsaVSHH EnZgvPg4AsNBeZzXf1cgfVuwiCtd7JkIgHPwu9DOUWAxsHe6iwrMdB0VTJuvjwASKKB7 WXv/vGzfMCrnPWnHUN7d3vBmtT7eyGoTn2q7Lpb5autxUc7KCN2DgqMjRJoSOzXbFswH HzLw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcZkGI+2aFqdWNFSzuEqesOvyTZ4d23RISP32mCvuJAfL+gp9Xq DOQn5CmK8GxsMPmO1RrFK3ZXe3u1ciAwWuloj2Q=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225K+VgKcgGbIG8sOtr3E0fg/6o/pzIaubGF4tKmfebXG3PCmzyfPI3sZ8q8pjoqDuHxbmSq1L4ZiANedHWLiNA=
X-Received: by 10.55.214.130 with SMTP id p2mr10309169qkl.248.1516634419119; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 07:20:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.31.135 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 07:20:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <878e3a08-572a-1fa1-f9f0-0b10f94cc1f0@science.ru.nl>
References: <4cce37d5-e87c-f23d-c1ab-14491a4d764c@science.ru.nl> <878e3a08-572a-1fa1-f9f0-0b10f94cc1f0@science.ru.nl>
From: David Wong <davidwong.crypto@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:20:18 +0000
Message-ID: <CAK3aN2omFY=LtG5QLCv-CvdoCXxy33aPD_U2yrO7Fe-BgZ37vg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benoît Viguier <b.viguier@science.ru.nl>
Cc: cfrg@irtf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/dLiS6MD5HUXbRRklpeOaNbCj9UI>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] KangarooTwelve draft has been updated to 01
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 15:20:25 -0000
> While the notation X, S by NIST SP - 800-185, I find Message and > Customization string easier to remember: > variable names should be able to give the reader an idea of what they are > about. Also NIST FIPS 180-4 and NIST FIPS 202 uses M for message. However if > a majority of people are in favor of (X,S), I don't mind switching for this > notation. By the way, why not giving them actual names like "custom_string" and "message"? David
- [Cfrg] KangarooTwelve draft has been updated to 01 Benoît Viguier
- Re: [Cfrg] KangarooTwelve draft has been updated … John Mattsson
- Re: [Cfrg] KangarooTwelve draft has been updated … Benoît Viguier
- Re: [Cfrg] KangarooTwelve draft has been updated … David Wong
- Re: [Cfrg] KangarooTwelve draft has been updated … Benoît Viguier