Re: [Cfrg] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke
Christopher Patton <cpatton@cloudflare.com> Mon, 31 August 2020 19:32 UTC
Return-Path: <cpatton@cloudflare.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D84A3A190E for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 12:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IFvbAWK8goZ2 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 12:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com (mail-qk1-x72e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 674FE3A1907 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 12:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id p185so7233286qkb.11 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 12:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Yh7oEcP1ZEacgDq1xzLrNOj2ortHL/iYhabe7NFdSy8=; b=b+RM0n0W94al7iE0Lue5r5MgIqSnGJnQbOWkIXVyOVEyxhlIogFda6IksSmcZuhqGY Jy5NGcjvFCyreCgbhYQC2XrbVriVMznKn6+m15XTkb2RD41IQ0RKoIr9nSXnEjvjpn1S VkXJDncttpYM4yePDy8+TgqJxLqyR3wxyXSI0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Yh7oEcP1ZEacgDq1xzLrNOj2ortHL/iYhabe7NFdSy8=; b=O78pqViG1qDgOmvIf/pcgvOW8Gm3e7JaKeOUSZeMAZwwpE36J9NnsLzJSnZbILklRb j24cQ9KwcqYsdKa5Cuvs2wvb+i9rP9Zs6djgD9c+/55Idx8hI4WVD1qg6yHwT4B+8i0R wZG9FfYwJx7UT3f+2gQ+4k2uMKYuM5e8HJxYxiYlzRqTq2MDzVePMx150HhgW/ramQ/n 747lJ2l7WYPJJmSCTKGzmYpXwz1DDb5KUsmupdnz9MnOhZbTUyDWFK4AP0ibL1JTibj6 pdWN4UGZzkhpVcmVx/cImR38m6k40OkEyObBogfT+fEkNM8d2nPKzfFlmiy3AJ5MT9Mj 1q6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531o0VCtihebxncQsMv2Wv0vzzvPeEK9uqxnwqX7uuZIHkg0mYDZ gGe21hTs8feUgBHaPV+J/UNGm2iJxMk+oOTktJDn+g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz0IFAGoY0KD9ypsHHJL9GZXsFn17zaWD3aumWdPiR8nOwaWACLHjsSEX7hCEkVEvtMAOLX3F5RXYRQgzJAzAU=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9402:: with SMTP id w2mr3121369qkd.329.1598902349597; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 12:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMr0u6k5Yx1i6KmdZVvBmonQHPDT_3+tWNTdJkpyLLRrwWuLfg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOgPGoCsL3tuJMSs4Twn0iiZ_BecvbKyCpmN+fqFKU+C732x9A@mail.gmail.com> <CAG2Zi22VPwRFh5ZNJ9sNsu52X_dkxUV5=1Mt99zwrHPCtdkRbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgR5Rs4-mZ5ytdCSW=Tu3cOC657RROhLFzzvuXAO6LBjPQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgR5Rs4-mZ5ytdCSW=Tu3cOC657RROhLFzzvuXAO6LBjPQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Patton <cpatton@cloudflare.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 12:32:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG2Zi20QGHnNNuPE_28OXTbZA+jKqXykDxpCeWDE1Q-sJnOXYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Cc: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>, CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>, cfrg-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000094363405ae3176ac"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/deq-1RrscSb2gB85ZHMUsgnTP5Q>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 19:32:32 -0000
> Agreed. I assume something like "base_nonce" would work? > "base_nonce" still sounds like it's a nonce. I would suggest something like "iv". Best, Chris P.
- [Cfrg] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev
- Re: [Cfrg] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke Christopher Patton
- Re: [Cfrg] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke Joseph Salowey
- Re: [Cfrg] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke Christopher Patton
- Re: [Cfrg] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke Richard Barnes
- Re: [Cfrg] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke Julia Len
- Re: [Cfrg] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)
- Re: [Cfrg] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke Karthikeyan Bhargavan
- Re: [Cfrg] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke Julia Len
- Re: [Cfrg] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke Karthikeyan Bhargavan
- Re: [Cfrg] Second RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke Julia Len