Re: [Cfrg] Identity-based 923-bit encryption broken
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 21 June 2012 14:59 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7D721F8703 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AZOp3Si0PfAV for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB11D21F8649 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-50-97.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.50.97] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5LExqFp061468 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:59:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <AD75EBD1-988B-490B-AD57-0CC3372C5597@vigilsec.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:59:53 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <51ECF220-BFDE-4479-9871-15FF0063134B@vpnc.org>
References: <AD75EBD1-988B-490B-AD57-0CC3372C5597@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: IRTF CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Identity-based 923-bit encryption broken
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:59:55 -0000
From the discussion of this topic on one of the cryptography lists, I think a better subject line would be "Some identity-based ...". Having said that, there is still a dearth of analysis from EC folks on this paper and the one that preceded it. --Paul Hoffman
- [Cfrg] Identity-based 923-bit encryption broken Russ Housley
- Re: [Cfrg] Identity-based 923-bit encryption brok… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Cfrg] Identity-based 923-bit encryption brok… David McGrew
- Re: [Cfrg] Identity-based 923-bit encryption brok… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: [Cfrg] Identity-based 923-bit encryption brok… Shin'ichiro Matsuo
- Re: [Cfrg] Identity-based 923-bit encryption brok… Matsuo Shin'ichiro