Re: [Cfrg] RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hash-to-curve-10
Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> Sun, 18 October 2020 01:41 UTC
Return-Path: <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34863A12B7 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 18:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.608
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.608 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=3.243, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZLzVuYI6P7iL for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 18:41:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83F33A12B5 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 18:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B5E40605C; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 18:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
cc: CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>, hmurray@megapathdsl.net
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> of "Sat, 17 Oct 2020 15:38:33 PDT." <CACsn0c=K0sctAW=1q68uhqtYza4BiN2=63OECkGOc-c81D1ixA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 18:41:30 -0700
Message-Id: <20201018014130.46B5E40605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/fG2t_7hkP32CoE3hZtJxCf7LtGY>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hash-to-curve-10
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 01:41:33 -0000
> My third nitpicky concern is archiving the hash2curve-repo. There are several > times implementers are referred to it, but it's a github repo. The RFC series > has outlasted many companies and storage media. However stable that looks > now, it isn't forever. Rotted references are an ever present threat. The Internet Archive has a project where they grab everything that is referenced by Wikipedia and patch the Wikipedia links to point to their copy when the original goes offline. I'm sure it wouldn't be hard to convince them to grab a copy of anything a draft or RFC links to. I doubt if we want them patching RFCs. Maybe an extra parallel document that could be linked to by the RFC page. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.
- [Cfrg] RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hash-to-curve-10 Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev
- Re: [Cfrg] RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hash-to-curve-… Greg Hudson
- Re: [Cfrg] RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hash-to-curve-… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hash-to-curve-… Hal Murray
- Re: [CFRG] [Cfrg] RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-hash-to… Leonid Reyzin