IETF Logo Mail Archive

[CFRG] Re: Is it appropriate for an RFC to mention specific projects or companies?

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Thu, 01 August 2024 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257C8C14CE39 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 13:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uHjfpe1pVrz3 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 13:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48DFCC14F73E for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 13:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2f032cb782dso79692291fa.3 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 01 Aug 2024 13:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1722545567; x=1723150367; darn=irtf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=d1SGBGqoVFJHCuceZsg4FTpMQMHcRDXmbjq9jVfzIeI=; b=aUigh3ei+LP92I4Fm/lZ/V23+n41lKAbAUU0q7A7DMLJ+9K4ec14qNeS5oxWcSU8oC O9zv2iNvNP3HnAYhEOoY/wgWNMBcEpREXKJpZjECokJdtIUFkdP2UtuamZTTpzwTMuIV kXqS96s0RoXbY5cemwVGRtbD6SUrmcaGT67bClROZh6hcVjwsEzkcdPflhrvOGpI2pEL iSyO0KP5keY46zlc9atX+xRlqJqoEOq2HlDZcStgBvlEcfGH680k3SJqommzkuWUWs4L MeXMuUZhBasuzMvgIjiVQe4Wi3VLCADGLiK+TlRzLl/9f9KMYcdS4LfJ5FSKt8WZfl9C x8gA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722545567; x=1723150367; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=d1SGBGqoVFJHCuceZsg4FTpMQMHcRDXmbjq9jVfzIeI=; b=F65d21KYs+oDHXjY3fLMbiqTj3XaUjsX/8UJ5BwowqgtqrbxRC0VxwGKihLGMOQMKB KWLBKxBFXQYCfp4qLVmaYADKv4I0MNPR/XGto+rUpNa9D5feJc5MNdaaUIM/uHVjtXEF qLuJAWfeBw1cF6ABac/C0wW1jvgjBaqsLupZoYmfNt3tzCxZcCTl874FKqcuBFJzomKW XNh+JuaBTBeE4visbDqdDEGRuIFkuxHom9IrVj4O7tT8AeEoPQb+2ijiIxaQEggHG2ez QoLtAeQZx0a6jA7G7jw94ri/LoMglX8LfLYriJyGcDomW5EOlKZ1MKoI08WhZKsat8ZW ADqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzuunc9USwPo0U9RUhva5lXhv9pPL1M6NPGBkM30w4crgefK4O1 RbqeXpp7KuR3lHBvR2M7zpuhBvLb36alp++Fv4yvMRniYbxXYG/Q49OI9zbpXGooZObz0s/gAgq GRLkfnl6knhNQVD5VrwuMn4BWBHIn4iot
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFhwVDVCtk3qzvEqU97ObZi67rmjNc5nnOQem7t56R+EvfgNfKu3HbXThuOYpFHwTd5DrA4zymNnr8OxAwMLYg=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b04c:0:b0:2ee:88d8:e807 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2f15aa930ffmr10110201fa.16.1722545566648; Thu, 01 Aug 2024 13:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAG2Zi22KO6=mDwbKHMvmh+DYkEqNbtBcGO==cNC2c_pcV1xwtg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG2Zi22KO6=mDwbKHMvmh+DYkEqNbtBcGO==cNC2c_pcV1xwtg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 13:52:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0cmdd4bxxsxUAXzxrOUiLTx+JY4PE4_hVok74AMyGSkCvg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Patton <cpatton=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: T7DIEIBN2JBGQGCJCHNCFWX5T6Z5TIXY
X-Message-ID-Hash: T7DIEIBN2JBGQGCJCHNCFWX5T6Z5TIXY
X-MailFrom: watsonbladd@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cfrg.irtf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [CFRG] Re: Is it appropriate for an RFC to mention specific projects or companies?
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/i-GJBnCixUSfpQYw3YO6TK2lJCo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cfrg-owner@irtf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cfrg-join@irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cfrg-leave@irtf.org>

Personally I feel that the passing mention of large deployments in
explaining why this is useful is fine. However, that section is rather
long already.

I don't see anything saying one way or the other in my cursory search.


On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 1:08 PM Christopher Patton
<cpatton=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for advice on how to close this open issue for draft-irtf-cfrg-vdaf:
> https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-vdaf/issues/338
>
> We currently mention a couple projects that motivated us to write down these algorithms. Are there any guidelines at IRTF or IETF that can help us figure out if this is appropriate?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris P.
> _______________________________________________
> CFRG mailing list -- cfrg@irtf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to cfrg-leave@irtf.org



--
Astra mortemque praestare gradatim

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status