MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAG2Zi22KO6=mDwbKHMvmh+DYkEqNbtBcGO==cNC2c_pcV1xwtg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAG2Zi22KO6=mDwbKHMvmh+DYkEqNbtBcGO==cNC2c_pcV1xwtg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 13:52:34 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CACsn0cmdd4bxxsxUAXzxrOUiLTx+JY4PE4_hVok74AMyGSkCvg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Patton <cpatton=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: T7DIEIBN2JBGQGCJCHNCFWX5T6Z5TIXY
CC: CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
Precedence: list
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BCFRG=5D_Re=3A_Is_it_appropriate_for_an_RFC_to_mention_specific_?=
 =?utf-8?q?projects_or_companies=3F?=
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/i-GJBnCixUSfpQYw3YO6TK2lJCo>

Personally I feel that the passing mention of large deployments in
explaining why this is useful is fine. However, that section is rather
long already.

I don't see anything saying one way or the other in my cursory search.


On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 1:08=E2=80=AFPM Christopher Patton
<cpatton=3D40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for advice on how to close this open issue for draft-irtf-cfr=
g-vdaf:
> https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-vdaf/issues/338
>
> We currently mention a couple projects that motivated us to write down th=
ese algorithms. Are there any guidelines at IRTF or IETF that can help us f=
igure out if this is appropriate?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris P.
> _______________________________________________
> CFRG mailing list -- cfrg@irtf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to cfrg-leave@irtf.org



--
Astra mortemque praestare gradatim