[CFRG] HPKE and AEAD Authentication Tag Length
Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> Mon, 23 August 2021 18:52 UTC
Return-Path: <joe@salowey.net>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EB33A011D for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=salowey-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R85ImeG3MBcX for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38D913A010D for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id q21so33187340ljj.6 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=salowey-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WRGmq17Cxp6omUs5qO9UhiUSr759vIuze8QjyJAGJJg=; b=aUxuh8iAgRxJB+FX5dQcNfl8xZO5QwV7XMYM6RZkHnO7fufxZaYHeP6zrJ2uj4zcje g5y7YnHmoTodAI5cYbWJLMbE96il24iam2gE3jji9xxPZ+yj5u7/qnES8IIbPgNqAk4i Ham3fhOwKAXBsedCd6FyxQXaIJ47ef5+xkKoeRqhtrillkkOrV8oNofrxdEQiblyHd9n QVdKortFST5qALYGb0px8JkUoFeBQYMVknW7TLqf2c1KQkppOLEtHGSVZMc7C95AQeXa 84W0TjQps5GpSIaBHoQ9IRtiqViZlUybBIPczTirHVa2TpJ5XB8T91Y+x7Vu9wYsUsem 2Mqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WRGmq17Cxp6omUs5qO9UhiUSr759vIuze8QjyJAGJJg=; b=WbEcfaOtJidXymhjhy7GafUdrQelYbly4LhRpVWut5+WrIKXJCig/sX+7FbmzfQCpI FFyOqAiDw/8RI+tEiwrDe2yHy/0CvBe43jRJu1Oexi5VBtDiSi3pp+HjvEEWqmnNWXUG OgZgLJ4k97Zh/iqsvVGYl8AT/qHC7mMmoANfBTtIX1LelMogbwmSiKI6ywz0/zzreNUJ 1i12mG7InEW973jrzYuP6nZTSt+X3n7tkWV8TkSpf0pfLuHjjM0u2nB4TxE2fctKN4I8 YlTOOrvg/qvq3Kh20ey0s4aHZ5GEbBs/HBF/vF9H3WpDXO8dE+jmh0KFjTZ4rbHmKlzQ ghKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530SyJAEmyoCVy13yQoESvHW8RNK/2CAKlPOQ2tDPV+nHklekAbd h2Hefo5juKfSdQxAy2FJk1usaau9wgJRN2EOsqW/V6NvbKs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7tJ+7K3l91Cz9xp0fGZ7vZ1RnUcraJ1G+My1li24cZ88SGqSqlkNrBRFssP/ENfOyQOc64G3TceJwljHFLeo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:b08:: with SMTP id b8mr28025602ljr.308.1629744760431; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:52:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOgPGoBK9Lq0D+ufJRYowXPcKJuT8gf81ZpJ0=RZzG8-f0=fpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: IRTF CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000085430c05ca3e8580"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/jG4TCN7vj4izXKSBQYjTjVSNkbg>
Subject: [CFRG] HPKE and AEAD Authentication Tag Length
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 18:52:49 -0000
In working on a Java HPKE implementation I found that specification does not specify anything about the authentication tag length for the AEAD cipher. I opened issue #283 <https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke/issues/238> and proposed PR 239 <https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-hpke/pull/239> to address this. Cheers, Joe
- [CFRG] HPKE and AEAD Authentication Tag Length Joseph Salowey
- Re: [CFRG] HPKE and AEAD Authentication Tag Length Martin Thomson
- Re: [CFRG] HPKE and AEAD Authentication Tag Length Dan Harkins
- Re: [CFRG] HPKE and AEAD Authentication Tag Length Peter Gutmann
- Re: [CFRG] HPKE and AEAD Authentication Tag Length Joseph Salowey
- Re: [CFRG] HPKE and AEAD Authentication Tag Length Dan Harkins
- [CFRG] Off-topic - Re: HPKE and AEAD Authenticati… denis bider
- Re: [CFRG] Off-topic - Re: HPKE and AEAD Authenti… Colin Perkins
- Re: [CFRG] Off-topic - Re: HPKE and AEAD Authenti… denis bider
- Re: [CFRG] Off-topic - Re: HPKE and AEAD Authenti… Nick Sullivan
- Re: [CFRG] HPKE and AEAD Authentication Tag Length Christopher Wood