Re: [Cfrg] Homomorphic Encryption Standardization – Side Meeting
Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Thu, 26 March 2020 18:49 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94C63A087B
for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.646
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001,
SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id YUHrIWICNS7z for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-f51.google.com (mail-ot1-f51.google.com
[209.85.210.51])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D0B43A00D9
for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-f51.google.com with SMTP id z5so6773248oth.9
for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=yDPPK5q67u7VdhD1LFbt8/97H59rbj3xFi+uWdBRgvI=;
b=RfBiA35BgaPEZ+bDvyQQc+cO3tJG4i1tTPgL/dCwQo5VB2VRJZ7uZq9wI9fYp+Lo6K
LQ/5uqWlU7T4x3KhVKOLJIPONbkzt3cqSXLOlSX/iZ+tdG2JtxVSax5AYrls9gieANmN
xlpJjpDKSMQ+6SQemBVSkIxGKU/vEZwipJ4y1qiHqeytwPrKuYdEbyrT/LEUzOJ9LefT
e9Cewmfm7ZgoYUXFr5nqNQcMPBpESTyVcmDNfy5QH+hcv8exfNjUvLjns8+MZ9nVXLsM
TLXUIc8m5/9i4AFyrgf63xD/Ihg+CL/+Y+sgjww+KH44C3jts5MRnLW6lExKpNo9wIpW
ZZ1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2XbuH1dQ6j+oOS+ANzrMp/+zjSmLX1pizh0oNuWqvDCNhOYX2p
1Og4ZfRk7YMFtnPkrE4kiDFAogBPnQbHZsaXjMk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvycpP9Gm/LAN0KjS0NDZcF4+1AduXVe50lUh+BRNg4oFFPLwKteKzGB4r8FwDDkADMbte7gAfjsYAQWK8lwJU=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:62c2:: with SMTP id z2mr967882otk.155.1585248591398;
Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <94CED3F7-BEBF-4E1B-A6B6-F464742BFAD5@gmail.com>
<CAMm+Lwj4D=ixRh_vZqsKCC75pZz4i5JcXo8rJKK+ppdqg9Qj6w@mail.gmail.com>
<20200326183842.GN18021@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20200326183842.GN18021@localhost>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:49:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwg+yTg_G6-yA0=01F-sr5GiK2a0Mx4b=_n17RgrODrw-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>,
standards@homomorphicencryption.org, "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>,
"saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>, Kim Laine <kim.laine@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002bce6705a1c67371"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/jTubzAfQPztOFfSfwUiq-NSuNkg>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] =?utf-8?q?Homomorphic_Encryption_Standardization_?=
=?utf-8?q?=E2=80=93_Side_Meeting?=
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>,
<mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>,
<mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 18:49:57 -0000
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 2:38 PM Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 02:22:49PM -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > > The other reason for bringing it into IRTF is that we really do need a > > clear IPR regime or else things can get ugly and efforts can stall. > > I hope by now everyone understands that patent IPR on crypto == 20 year > kiss of death. That explains a great deal of our collective habit of > waiting 20+ years to make use of new primitives -- it certainly does for > PAKEs, for example. Of course, for some that might be a feature. > +1 I follow the expiry of patents pretty closely. The Mesh uses crypto that was patent encumbered until very recently. A feature I have not yet added to the Mesh messaging layer but plan to add is Micali's simultaneous contracts.
- [Cfrg] Homomorphic Encryption Standardization – S… Yaron Sheffer
- Re: [Cfrg] Homomorphic Encryption Standardization… Russ Housley
- Re: [Cfrg] Homomorphic Encryption Standardization… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] Homomorphic Encryption Standardization… Nico Williams
- Re: [Cfrg] Homomorphic Encryption Standardization… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] Homomorphic Encryption Standardization… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL