[Cfrg] Any update on GOST or more generally?

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sun, 21 October 2012 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD0321F8A0D for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.542
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.542 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1fYL6ejSjIXH for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:08:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.scss.tcd.ie [IPv6:2001:770:10:200:889f:cdff:fe8d:ccd2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA90F21F8992 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6231B17147A for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:08:27 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:mime-version :user-agent:from:date:message-id:received:received: x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1350853706; bh=roGdenoGfNPgRnXzH+d8LpEP w5e8QX2HsW1AJOQJK38=; b=0x2JUT/ZuQsxJ+5eivo9xA59WafSu2X/l2U2cbAI 2h9fjZZXF39P8O+mFVs2tAaxBcURjRffB/j2WLYFHl1psx4RMvK7IgFOBURY+Njo +UeTY3Z+fNzi8uxor8hHIVSI+miOsiFCV0z6Cz+8MYd0OJ5/nzCQtwTmeFQxJHjR m+QbC1EZXL6oYFkp4fyL/Pfej0RdV7ljXsSkeQNjEOYS8vPPs0mPEmmg94xtrCH1 q+lPXMKFkeBB7lvPDz4vFC4Mao6qWPv6mufSbEtutmqZX33paReh2vOzfBblSnPn 1GY5STNcc9WYwjmK2ykuQV2HfB3saG00h1C9CxACCSyOZw==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie []) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id R-tEHF4P9aWO for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:08:26 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [] (unknown []) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A729171478 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:08:24 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <50846448.4030608@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:08:24 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121017 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Cfrg] Any update on GOST or more generally?
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 21:08:35 -0000


Someone asked me about [1] and whether the IETF ought make
any changes as a result.

My initial reaction was that 2^172 is still more than 3DES
but its probably worth asking here.

Any CFRG thoughts on this development or more generally if
there are changes with other cryptographic functions
are welcome.

No need for an I-D, some mail is fine and we could take it
from there if there's something to do.


[1] http://eprint.iacr.org/2012/138