[Cfrg] Any update on GOST or more generally?

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sun, 21 October 2012 21:08 UTC

Message-ID: <50846448.4030608@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:08:24 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121017 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Cfrg] Any update on GOST or more generally?
Precedence: list

Hiya,

Someone asked me about [1] and whether the IETF ought make
any changes as a result.

My initial reaction was that 2^172 is still more than 3DES
but its probably worth asking here.

Any CFRG thoughts on this development or more generally if
there are changes with other cryptographic functions
are welcome.

No need for an I-D, some mail is fine and we could take it
from there if there's something to do.

Thanks,
S.

[1] http://eprint.iacr.org/2012/138

[Cfrg] Any update on GOST or more generally? Stephen Farrell
Re: [Cfrg] Any update on GOST or more generally? Jon Callas
Re: [Cfrg] Any update on GOST or more generally? Stephen Farrell
[Cfrg] Camellia as an Japanese national cipher Paul Hoffman
Re: [Cfrg] Camellia as an Japanese national cipher Jon Callas
Re: [Cfrg] Camellia as an Japanese national cipher Yoav Nir
Re: [Cfrg] Camellia as an Japanese national cipher Thomas Hardjono