Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on security levels (ends on February 17th)

"Annie Yousar" <a.yousar@informatik.hu-berlin.de> Wed, 11 February 2015 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <a.yousar@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745141A3B9F for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:46:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.161
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.161 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PxoCNpDyr5Ss for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:46:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout1.informatik.hu-berlin.de (mailout1.informatik.hu-berlin.de [141.20.20.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A0B41A1E0F for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:46:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailbox.informatik.hu-berlin.de (mailbox [141.20.20.63]) by mail.informatik.hu-berlin.de (8.14.7/8.14.7/INF-2.0-MA-SOLARIS-2.10-25) with ESMTP id t1BJkSaL006472 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:46:29 +0100 (MET)
Received: from www2.informatik.hu-berlin.de (www2.informatik.hu-berlin.de [141.20.20.55]) by mailbox.informatik.hu-berlin.de (8.14.7/8.14.7/INF-2.0-MA-SOLARIS-2.10-25) with ESMTP id t1BJkRpu006469 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:46:27 +0100 (MET)
Received: from 79.218.216.18 (SquirrelMail authenticated user giessman) by www2.informatik.hu-berlin.de with HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:46:27 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <1293.79.218.216.18.1423683987.squirrel@www2.informatik.hu-berlin.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:46:27 +0100
From: Annie Yousar <a.yousar@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
To: cfrg@irtf.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at mailbox
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded STARTTLS authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.1 (mail.informatik.hu-berlin.de [141.20.20.50]); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:46:29 +0100 (MET)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/kXjtclTbmQLRWR3mgW45id0OjTs>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Elliptic Curves - poll on security levels (ends on February 17th)
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:46:35 -0000

Am 10.02.2015 um 11:52 schrieb Alexey Melnikov:
> CFRG chairs are starting a poll, containing 2 initial questions:
>
> Q1: Should CFRG recommend a curve at the 192-bit security level?
Yes. It corresponds to 384 bit curves.

> Q2: Should CFRG recommend a curve at the 256-bit security level?
Yes. It corresponds to 512 bit curves.