IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] irsg review of draft-mcgrew-hash-sigs-12

Richard Outerbridge <outer@interlog.com> Wed, 05 September 2018 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <outer@interlog.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618C1130EB8; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xx5ZzT0opsqm; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net (mail-1.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 849CE130E91; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 11:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (offload-3.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.70]) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767D22EA4E0; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 14:46:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net ([208.85.220.69]) by localhost (offload-3.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YBMdEZs8BU-3; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 14:36:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.168.110] (toroon0246w-lp130-04-50-100-149-69.dsl.bell.ca [50.100.149.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: outer@interlog.com) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B0712EA24D; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 14:46:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Richard Outerbridge <outer@interlog.com>
Message-Id: <4EF0ED72-A656-4C91-8ECD-0EAB0F96DFE3@interlog.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7D2150C2-D27D-4CD5-BEE5-95B642D3A13E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 14:46:43 -0400
In-Reply-To: <667A88DF-BD83-4D85-9546-0B4EAEF4A5E9@akamai.com>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)" <sfluhrer@cisco.com>, "irsg@irtf.org" <irsg@irtf.org>, IRTF CFRG <Cfrg@irtf.org>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
References: <be39f4e5-1cf7-9bf4-1bcb-6192e2168137@cs.tcd.ie> <b822dc1c93ae440291cabd642404d671@XCH-RTP-006.cisco.com> <59d9a102-8ba8-3469-8277-3facb0dd6a11@cs.tcd.ie> <c49c33c775df425ca76886082b3b19c2@XCH-RTP-006.cisco.com> <2ec3c347-47c9-79e2-22c0-bc8d257e4f90@cs.tcd.ie> <CABkgnnV-3tHZGT3pJjhFM=_p2fVJP0vB0_kwfYZsffEdhreY1Q@mail.gmail.com> <05526BE1-A13E-46ED-B79C-07849704EB71@interlog.com> <667A88DF-BD83-4D85-9546-0B4EAEF4A5E9@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/l-vNunLccDUYu_6HbQOa2vnMiH4>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] irsg review of draft-mcgrew-hash-sigs-12
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 18:46:57 -0000

> On 2018-09-05 (248), at 08:19:25, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> 
> >For shore true, butt there’s always the Lord of the Rings risk: ”One ring to rule them all …”
>  
> Shouldn’t that be addressed at the “higher layer” by allow agility?  I mean the protocol is going to have to expose the knobs, negotiate their settings, etc., etc.

The devil is in the details, yes of course.  That’s the problem, surely?
__outer

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status