IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 11 March 2015 03:11 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9C81A007B for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 20:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VcQo3AOkiB6t for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 20:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3B8E1A00EA for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 20:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-99-2.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t2B3BAww099216 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 20:11:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-99-2.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.2] claimed to be [10.20.30.101]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <7BAC95F5A7E67643AAFB2C31BEE662D020E29C4319@SC-VEXCH2.marvell.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 20:11:10 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B6688B85-EABE-43A1-8928-5747448F1E65@vpnc.org>
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73AAF91123@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <BE305B0B-80D2-48C6-ACE6-6F6544A04D69@vpnc.org> <7BAC95F5A7E67643AAFB2C31BEE662D020E29C4319@SC-VEXCH2.marvell.com>
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/lU4wkdUqWnMYNTtCsgTY-vinKEg>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Submission of curve25519 to NIST from CFRG
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 03:11:12 -0000

Is there anyone from NIST still on this list? If so, can you please present an informal paper at the conference with an up-to-the-minute summary of the CFRG status at the time of the meeting? Extra points if you can do so without the terms "delay" and "bickering", of course.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email