Re: [Cfrg] RFCs for wider-block RC6 and OCB
Pierre Karpman <pierre.karpman@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> Wed, 17 October 2018 12:32 UTC
Return-Path: <pierre.karpman@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A4F128CF2 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 05:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id taQboPo0Tzzt for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 05:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zm-mta-out-1.u-ga.fr (zm-mta-out-1.u-ga.fr [152.77.200.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E062312008A for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 05:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zm-mta-out.u-ga.fr (zm-mta-out.u-ga.fr [152.77.200.58]) by zm-mta-out-1.u-ga.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0572BA05B6; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:32:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from zm-mbx5.u-ga.fr (zm-mbx5.u-ga.fr [152.77.200.7]) by zm-mta-out.u-ga.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C05E009D; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:32:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:32:22 +0200
From: Pierre Karpman <pierre.karpman@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>
To: Ted Krovetz <ted@krovetz.net>, cfrg@ietf.org
Message-ID: <789168725.15151145.1539779542970.JavaMail.zimbra@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.27.1539716404.30870.cfrg@irtf.org>
References: <mailman.27.1539716404.30870.cfrg@irtf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_879ec6c6-7c7d-48d7-a513-3f2951c2f190"
X-Originating-IP: [152.77.200.60]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.7.11_GA_3012 (ZimbraWebClient - FF62 (Mac)/8.7.11_GA_3012)
Thread-Topic: RFCs for wider-block RC6 and OCB
Thread-Index: 4QjhK4c3qz7nMG3uBxoDVvv/v+aGIw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/m2kBkMqPMWLljsrEoydbc53_iGA>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] RFCs for wider-block RC6 and OCB
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 12:32:28 -0000
Hello Ted, If this starts gathering some interest, do you think it would also make sense to propose additional large-block block ciphers? I'm for instance thinking about SHACAL-2. All the best, Pierre -- Pierre Karpman * https://www-ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Karpman/ > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:02:28 -0700 > From: Ted Krovetz <ted@krovetz.net> > To: cfrg@ietf.org > Subject: [Cfrg] RFCs for wider-block RC6 and OCB > Message-ID: <E617CD1F-AD92-42CA-B054-5CFD20AF4A6E@krovetz.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Hello, > About six months ago I put together an Internet-Draft that specified how to use > the authenticated-encryption algorithm OCB and a block cipher without 128-bit > blocks. This was in response to a few researchers and developers who had > expressed interest in such a thing. As an exemplar I wrote RC6 (and RC5) code > and an Internet-Draft for block lengths other than originally intended. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krovetz-ocb-wideblock/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krovetz-rc6-rc5-vectors/ > My question for CFRG is whether I should pursue these RFCs through the > Independent submission channel, or whether there is interest within CFRG to > review and/or sponsor the drafts. > Thank you, > Ted Krovetz > *************************************
- [Cfrg] RFCs for wider-block RC6 and OCB Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] RFCs for wider-block RC6 and OCB Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] RFCs for wider-block RC6 and OCB Pierre Karpman
- Re: [Cfrg] RFCs for wider-block RC6 and OCB Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Cfrg] RFCs for wider-block RC6 and OCB David McGrew (mcgrew)
- Re: [Cfrg] RFCs for wider-block RC6 and OCB Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] RFCs for wider-block RC6 and OCB David McGrew (mcgrew)
- Re: [Cfrg] RFCs for wider-block RC6 and OCB Ted Krovetz