IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539?

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 12 January 2017 06:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5432F129415 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:25:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.158
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.158 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LONGWORDS=2.035, MPART_ALT_DIFF_COUNT=1.112, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N4S3hafQB_Mc for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:24:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wj0-x232.google.com (mail-wj0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c01::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2EF812941A for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:24:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wj0-x232.google.com with SMTP id ew7so5283412wjc.3 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:24:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:references:to:date; bh=Jj3cMio1Thk6lrzdGm77GNyrNOiyVkkPLVDsLg66nQY=; b=KWLxBGkOAz/D6QVj2UPRsQzBECtd3lvuxMLtjhv6gVoDrpffpdSm7AnTRHCbCDgxjl kUmJf3eO3lHyIOCXTW8mhx9D7yM3YMORzf3pgFSlLWbndAFgVjcSyTrK8H44Cbq2sJQu IKFMd1EehP57uejLPinkgL3uhAfI/KKZzUlXPO85nq+1oioP65b04C7d8Z8uQiS2vrCb t2jx9Pn6HmJxOyGH69xVDe5nuJq/rTrgy8bJbhrB/pKEwqKUtVRHK2ZbqD0jwFgi/lTy Z1PEElLAPHW3yFlr6gJQ624IvMLBiqVE2eprcSvboPhyJ6G3PBzj8E00/MeCB1g0z1ez I8Yg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:references :to:date; bh=Jj3cMio1Thk6lrzdGm77GNyrNOiyVkkPLVDsLg66nQY=; b=goiH90Sj7321dGpNT5tWQW0EDz0LIIKSj2wDkOZT/v100BnOUFV+4g9zB8M5qkY8B3 bOEFnYIi/gMFzx3wtIu7cVlFq9P7oZmEc4QtUnROHU68cDRuC+A6iBER3GatI8VR/wAF N5XTbM3i+lzxOCzCFEJWXWWxKh3B95kmi7/eYSUUP65b/jR7R2yfIfblFVibLiikhfmc VSOOurvSy871/LqzVw4P55t31NFG8kcr6Xrzv1gQxor+XOQryVT16ohGjGqNdBGWdLL7 3mE6gzLmOye/dX0LEhMlaS95zNtP/lWBCXb/EnJveaJ5GXIVymcQabex0cRLhSIJxRof +jhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLV96ePyafbPQTyduuVHZFVX0BsynwfbnWc7kYH/w5iNA3Nm1iE1y+PI1sygDtdNw==
X-Received: by 10.194.40.38 with SMTP id u6mr393837wjk.205.1484202295238; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:24:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.137.50] ([176.12.243.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id yy7sm11835888wjc.3.2017.01.11.22.24.46 for <cfrg@irtf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:24:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_719BD5CD-5FCF-46C5-8A03-91A419D480DF"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Message-Id: <A57288FC-C629-472F-8394-DB58C45EEC25@gmail.com>
References: <46ECD4D0-07BB-4082-82AC-4B2AE656AE09@gmail.com>
To: IRTF CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 08:24:44 +0200
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/mcwdmMQFzac80eAKBYM6DZlkl4Y>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 08:01:47 -0800
Subject: [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539?
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 06:25:06 -0000

Reminder.

Is there interest in pushing this forward?

Yoav

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Rev RFC 7539?
> Date: 16 November 2016 at 9:09:11 GMT+2
> To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
> Cc: IRTF CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
> 
> Cycles found.
> 
> Attached please find two files:
>   1. rfc7539_long.txt is RFC 7539 with page breaks and page numbers removed. 
>  2. draft-nir-cfrg-rfc7539bis-00.raw.txt is the unpaginated form of the new draft.
> 
> Couldn’t do much about the boilerplate, but this makes it easy to compare.
> 
> Yoav
> 
> 
> 
>> On 16 Nov 2016, at 10:06, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com <mailto:sean@sn3rd.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> +1 - if you got the cycles.
>> 
>> spt
>> 
>>> On Nov 14, 2016, at 15:55, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com <mailto:ekr@rtfm.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> This seems like a good plan.
>>> 
>>> -Ekr
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:ynir.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> RFC 7539 (“ChaCha20 and Poly1305 for IETF Protocols”)[1] is now implemented in many places and referenced by 3 RFCs and 8 Internet Drafts ([2])
>>> 
>>> However, the quality of the document is not where we’d like it to be. There have been 7 errata filed against it. Most of it is editorial or insignificant, but still no errata is better than some errata.
>>> 
>>> So what do the participants and chairs think about spinning up a quick[4] rfc7539bis that has the same text, except that the errata will be merged in?
>>> 
>>> I think such a document should be fairly easy and quick.
>>> 
>>> Yoav
>>> 
>>> P.S: and yes, of course I’m volunteering to write it.
>>> 
>>> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7539 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7539>
>>> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7539/referencedby/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7539/referencedby/>
>>> [3] https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7539 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7539>
>>> [4] My spell check actually corrected “quick” to “quic”. The contents of my mails are veering far away from regular English.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cfrg mailing list
>>> Cfrg@irtf.org <mailto:Cfrg@irtf.org>
>>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cfrg mailing list
>>> Cfrg@irtf.org
>>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email