IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-hdevalence-cfrg-ristretto-01

"Riad S. Wahby" <rsw@jfet.org> Mon, 30 September 2019 23:22 UTC

Return-Path: <rswatjfet.org@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B89912008F for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.478
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.478 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.172, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dtq0SslSalLm for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-f181.google.com (mail-pl1-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59C8E120077 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-f181.google.com with SMTP id k7so4508652pll.1 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=JVAx9CvjCCVu2w5Wg6r96IOfNOCFDqIc07dKxrAuCK4=; b=jPxlzyM6pIed4PfeYTGE8kqbYi1TZgbusI3O0+VduqQeXaRkVFTO34YS2HJ2PpZqOe 7T4tIOoznR5y5DoqAAr9KQjO029THB1Ah1eg18OF8U2Q+UmEZQuEMr0uqikdQWjFJtK3 2VZUMkfqr7+fe971L3u4rQpVBTPzIcrfJWPdmKnT+Cp12OVtJhrSiC+yK5aPqO/o7I1h V23td4CDClFAvrABT7kReKdzaPacKOYabIXihkabFOJX5m+yylp2/aAmPaI5FjEdhst8 ISDvOAvnyDYTPAhKiNWZBh0jFx1IeK2s/MGkRuW3sslbQg2+X3rKnFAWU28npmDGVWRQ J00Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUTArRf1x9ZcVv1hgSPeBpaQQ8tN4byHy++PmsGMU+RbvTICD63 oY1a22okaxbA/MeagbdDMmK3SKl+
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyCG5T2T7PmsNe0Wi8xTKPzBDAxYPXiEZv7Uuae0+IGM0Hm/xgkInbQvLtx1xxzbah/AQ6aUg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b287:: with SMTP id u7mr22516291plr.72.1569885752265; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (positron.stanford.edu. [171.67.76.114]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z4sm579341pjt.17.2019.09.30.16.22.31 for <cfrg@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:22:31 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:22:30 -0700
From: "Riad S. Wahby" <rsw@jfet.org>
To: "cfrg@ietf.org" <cfrg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190930232230.bouz6ipft5dk2k5x@positron.jfet.org>
References: <e43c34da-1e2c-d1b5-9fc1-5bcc8373ebc8@isode.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e43c34da-1e2c-d1b5-9fc1-5bcc8373ebc8@isode.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/nHU2hrbTf-wB_vGFMyHokQZhLlc>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Call for adoption: draft-hdevalence-cfrg-ristretto-01
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 23:22:34 -0000

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
> Please give your views on whether this document should be adopted as a CFRG
> draft, and if so, whether you'd be willing to help work on it/review it.
> Please reply to this email (or in exceptional circumstances you can email
> CFRG chairs directly at cfrg-chairs@ietf.org).

Standardizing Decaf and/or Ristretto is a great idea--strongly support!

I'm happy to work with the Ristretto authors to make sure that this
document and hash-to-curve are well aligned and to give feedback on
the Ristretto document.

-=rsw

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email