Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"
Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> Wed, 25 February 2015 23:07 UTC
Return-Path: <bascule@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0351A914E for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:07:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rAzOOTN5fesG for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:07:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22c.google.com (mail-yk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 710421A904C for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:07:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ykp9 with SMTP id 9so2411275ykp.10 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:07:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=8zJIv4hNapTm7ufMoIBVZzcoyFwWfrlF0sVAUiDGUB4=; b=o3l/jB+p5gH2DTDw5z8hgFiR/Vd6U9UGKH70SV5W0x817dTmBvBU6dfOMLNzOzfZ/d QRstRpICr9ThAVRkyVBf0cEIAjzTGOCdAfXt08lk0Vn508LapcAIux3mXseb+E/I2tsf N2OKcv4n0+ldlQA2xiXVG5U+AqmakqubopblOj2NH3XURYcWeXwEHbNawW7eAgs+cnK1 Wn3b9r5NNTiSxhJVnnblMqrHfsN65RTvIOI5hZ1JLqk/SCsqwVUvBjlolNbKoiX72v6S CHDW2l2Fh6V7IogZWxnWHEFW5tx+VF9SPNDNEGT5s2kEJtxx8FOxwiEgDwmQ9DEt6oxy IXjA==
X-Received: by 10.170.129.202 with SMTP id v193mr4735681ykb.129.1424905624597; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:07:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.170.42.129 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:06:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHOTMVK4v5BsU5=Nd0zpK8kVT_voZAMRu4v7HpXTaeC+ThOLCA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <54EDDBEE.5060904@isode.com> <54EDEE67.1010102@cs.tcd.ie> <D02DF679-9485-467F-A47C-FFF15139278B@vpnc.org> <q0xidr.nkcbrp.2vaesh-qmf@mercury.scss.tcd.ie> <CAHOTMVK4v5BsU5=Nd0zpK8kVT_voZAMRu4v7HpXTaeC+ThOLCA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:06:43 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHOTMVKvjYk2YGuxqUFfG9DDPbot9LOSLhQjJ9O+8zR1QOg_jA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1139a04697c531050ff1b164"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/nl185ySD9HxQkOjY6PIWthZpbjA>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST"
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 23:07:07 -0000
Also I strongly hope NIST will adopt the curves the CFRG decides upon, provided they're good! ;) -- Tony Arcieri
- [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred curves … Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Adam Langley
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Simon Josefsson
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Derek Atkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Damien Miller
- [Cfrg] On "non-NIST" Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST" stephen.farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST" Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST" Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST" Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST" Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST" Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] On "non-NIST" Damien Miller
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Dan Brown
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… _MiW
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Rene Struik
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… David Leon Gil
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Andrey Jivsov
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… David Gil
- Re: [Cfrg] Rerun: Elliptic Curves - preferred cur… Benjamin Beurdouche
- [Cfrg] Results of the poll: Elliptic Curves - pre… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Cfrg] Results of the poll: Elliptic Curves -… Benjamin Black
- Re: [Cfrg] Results of the poll: Elliptic Curves -… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] Results of the poll: Elliptic Curves -… Michael Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] Results of the poll: Elliptic Curves -… Benjamin Black
- Re: [Cfrg] Results of the poll: Elliptic Curves -… Benjamin Black
- Re: [Cfrg] Comb algorithm IPR status (was: Result… Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] Comb algorithm IPR status (was: Result… Benjamin Black
- Re: [Cfrg] Comb algorithm IPR status Mike Hamburg
- Re: [Cfrg] Comb algorithm IPR status Alyssa Rowan
- Re: [Cfrg] Comb algorithm IPR status Benjamin Black
- Re: [Cfrg] Comb algorithm IPR status Benjamin Black