Return-Path: X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CF8126DEE for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 01:02:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id spy3-MPD5aBx for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 01:02:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail04.dandomain.dk (mail04.dandomain.dk [194.150.112.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FEC2124319 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 01:02:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from Morten ([62.44.135.202]) by mail04.dandomain.dk (DanDomain Mailserver) with ASMTP id 4201712081002471840; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 10:02:47 +0100 From: "Erik Andersen" To: "Cfrg" Cc: "Carsten Strunge" Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 10:02:47 +0100 Message-ID: <000801d37003$5165df80$f4319e80$@x500.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_01D3700B.B32C9170" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AdNwAj7rtSh6exWUShSQuW95dPBnSg== Content-Language: en-gb Archived-At: Subject: [Cfrg] Use of the term "deprecated" X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 09:02:56 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01D3700B.B32C9170 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In the smart grid security standards the term deprecated is used for certain cryptographic algorithms, such as SHA-1, instead of disallowing them. NIST in SP 800-57, Part 1 Revision 4 has stopped using the term deprecated. What is the general feeling among list members on using the term deprecated on cryptographic algorithms? Erik ------=_NextPart_000_0009_01D3700B.B32C9170 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In the smart grid security standards the term = deprecated is used for certain cryptographic algorithms, such as SHA-1, = instead of disallowing them. NIST in SP 800-57, Part 1 Revision 4 has = stopped using the term deprecated.

What is the = general feeling among list members on using the term deprecated on = cryptographic algorithms?

Erik

------=_NextPart_000_0009_01D3700B.B32C9170--