IETF Logo Mail Archive

[CFRG] Re: Is it appropriate for an RFC to mention specific projects or companies?

Christopher Patton <cpatton@cloudflare.com> Fri, 02 August 2024 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <cpatton@cloudflare.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5141C1D52F4 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 16:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0mAByHYp7brI for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 16:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x832.google.com (mail-qt1-x832.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::832]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E66CDC1CAE60 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 16:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x832.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-44fe11dedb3so39269621cf.1 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 16:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google09082023; t=1722640749; x=1723245549; darn=irtf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cFk+Ac0fXGiqW9Kw9OQDZCplu+BQmJgZcl0vT4kuMd8=; b=AJIEt26Q5P4nNtrg9bTmw83j6Pc42mR8JxUqXcKUB+p1ZnsodL00i1k3HHSUUuUWtQ gkMf/KMPAq0h1slkBOiJbAM/268Xh14JBD8F9YN+ySlNc/tkMsX4OU8TD6PAOpPIKwFz JRxVbFRbaj7lBIXrHYwgU3IFw2+xWAAxwiiqacFFdQ0AfgI1oSr5+7C+7i3n8oMWOZPv e+cwzO72V7Ly/dTqzRY/dxeeKNzCTw1ZPDCTUoNi5zsnG5KchctKbgxOFnVdjbklsJ0X 51zdLngmksP0LCc6PipyvO9bjmPyCUVok7x/07Je0U178/uANzZXezwQ278x8HL20Qta 2RjA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722640749; x=1723245549; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cFk+Ac0fXGiqW9Kw9OQDZCplu+BQmJgZcl0vT4kuMd8=; b=l8zQKWQkBX+MNZhi11eJNLibDYWe+wYP6mNRD8JJAguMNwGHv09Gagy62JeZLzi55A gjuCGz80gLrElsvXQL9LR64W7usqPPHcjOuLcLcr46i+F4FfoQPvcYFbP/PzD27f5MTu 3Se/9aAlNpp3EIIp1zRF6VZZJAH48GRdFeinY0sFjj2CDbE4D/lQHBugBZmIj9q4eIc1 JXIBqwWsi7DMvX5ChYRYRm8XaC5+TxNzyRVZqGtM7xIgsJNWpCw9uxHQugVXqsO7CLB3 dTl/cBBbS4KFR3D2L4/K9d4n9Vhi51k7rO3GJ2Q0gdalaR/aAo+smUfRh3aEzP925Lci jwAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxeSSefIcFvon6pAQCauTZJd45pCDS/BoM8aiEF/ngRUz2Gu8h3 /aiTYTjkndgohpaWnIfvaijx6DzUlYvctFwQBiaeriRQLUKhLcmMuVGaBDxcAZRl//uhdw8M4JM u/gaFLUQ1/oFdv7W0iV+XFtIa0bg2NQdVERdd+M8GW93+EHPGILI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFB9DHCTtjs7nMk7iR5qvx52WftKp41+dR66/dqQI2SBiedKboGzg4t9YIXaE4sqVb5WJR5RPaeWtRsogMxc7Y=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5a16:0:b0:44f:f6ed:3fc6 with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-45189324f15mr65952601cf.48.1722640748728; Fri, 02 Aug 2024 16:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAG2Zi22KO6=mDwbKHMvmh+DYkEqNbtBcGO==cNC2c_pcV1xwtg@mail.gmail.com> <CAG2Zi224rPat83barP3LeBMvCjfKCk3jXnTMh4UnqP26=0FLcQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG2Zi224rPat83barP3LeBMvCjfKCk3jXnTMh4UnqP26=0FLcQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Patton <cpatton@cloudflare.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 16:18:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG2Zi22=x2o2Jn9zFjjczc-O8DYY3a-Cc9bpCx6jyLaedhO5PA@mail.gmail.com>
To: CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e76d3f061ebb8dd9"
Message-ID-Hash: 6IVMGSZGTFIX2CP4MOOXGIEJZUY6XM37
X-Message-ID-Hash: 6IVMGSZGTFIX2CP4MOOXGIEJZUY6XM37
X-MailFrom: cpatton@cloudflare.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cfrg.irtf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [CFRG] Re: Is it appropriate for an RFC to mention specific projects or companies?
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/o_55E8SF4LUrBaeAq_GZXWUCMII>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cfrg-owner@irtf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cfrg-join@irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cfrg-leave@irtf.org>

Here's the PR if anyone would like to review:
https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-vdaf/pull/387

On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 9:37 AM Christopher Patton <cpatton@cloudflare.com>
wrote:

> Thanks all for the feedback!
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 1:07 PM Christopher Patton <cpatton@cloudflare.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm looking for advice on how to close this open issue for
>> draft-irtf-cfrg-vdaf:
>> https://github.com/cfrg/draft-irtf-cfrg-vdaf/issues/338
>>
>> We currently mention a couple projects that motivated us to write down
>> these algorithms. Are there any guidelines at IRTF or IETF that can help us
>> figure out if this is appropriate?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris P.
>>
>

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status