[Cfrg] Laurent Ciavaglia's No Objection on draft-irtf-cfrg-randomness-improvements-12: (with COMMENT)

Laurent Ciavaglia via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 26 May 2020 10:31 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF253A0A51; Tue, 26 May 2020 03:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Laurent Ciavaglia via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IRSG" <irsg@irtf.org>
Cc: draft-irtf-cfrg-randomness-improvements@ietf.org, cfrg-chairs@ietf.org, cfrg@ietf.org, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, alexey.melnikov@isode.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.1.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Laurent Ciavaglia <laurent.ciavaglia@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <159048907928.30613.10853693966143140296@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 03:31:19 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/p2czGQJPU-Q8PF0aEky69TbjYM8>
Subject: [Cfrg] Laurent Ciavaglia's No Objection on draft-irtf-cfrg-randomness-improvements-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 10:31:21 -0000

Laurent Ciavaglia has entered the following ballot position for
draft-irtf-cfrg-randomness-improvements-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Not being an expert in the field, I read the document from a high-level point
of view. The document is sufficiently well-written to be understandable from a
wide audience, and is clear in its goal. Only a minor suggestion: when using
"an adversary Adv", it may be better to put 'Adv' to avoid any confusion with
another meaning or misspelling of a word or acronym.