Re: [Cfrg] Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair

Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net> Sat, 21 December 2013 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <trevp@trevp.net>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C95A1ADF9E for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:25:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r-25I7nnTEmP for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:25:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81631AD669 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:25:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id bz8so4920369wib.11 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:25:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2HRciO60qKLvBnq0bz7dkHQyQLitTfR4/XZGh7vlA+E=; b=ND/Zkzjg5zMNnDOc44A+YdBp37DujDTYv8O8GEFtpYi9AMNqlvI6EskYjsffX8bmLz XFk2WEzZu0ZfCqTOHRWJrliD1LSQRLVzL20tIZKQ1qVP3n3f+IkQK54BQrqnK0FtQoQt Oe/0+6tJPqHOKJcIPe+VulmkxCiDUAotEpCGaXItSc3egq3dHn7M+bvsCnupOo0MDXzz 4/F4yZ/8alCc40ybnGbWQ0bzO3RiqY7ADeYoOF4nhVfVwir0Kc6eGq6+kX0Fvsj7hayT qsqztS784PnCwA2N86n9PrTswU+dRMtllJ8JPyA+QBU04A7JSti2Dq45876PbIO7Z+cm i7kQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlIQ8WgehweNXZu/erz2JvG+4BOtzocebgwxMDUZn+eWSfkNNmkec6G6SA2CPFHxg2Ut6Ct
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.94.164 with SMTP id dd4mr12691999wib.20.1387646753484; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:25:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.214.134 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:25:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [199.83.223.81]
In-Reply-To: <45FC33A8-1944-4DCD-B88E-2A6B6CC4A39B@netapp.com>
References: <CAGZ8ZG2f9QHX40RcB8aajWvEfG0Gh_uewu2Rq7bQGHYNx6cOmw@mail.gmail.com> <45FC33A8-1944-4DCD-B88E-2A6B6CC4A39B@netapp.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:25:53 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGZ8ZG3077tdr03nTD5E3DMVXeKVC6-sgs7oWVHPaPHe_mQ8KA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:25:58 -0000

On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com>; wrote:
>
> I'd also like to ask CFRG participants to discuss the arguments you are raising

Hi Lars,

I think the issues here are also relevant to the IETF WGs which rely on CFRG.

I hope there's some way to engage this broader set of stakeholders in
the discussion.  I admit I'm not sure the best way to do that.


Trevor