IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] (technical flaws to be corrected in next version of the draft) Fwd: Re: Adoption of draft-agl-cfrgcurve-00 as a RG document

Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org> Wed, 28 January 2015 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <alangley@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07D01A87AD for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:10:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTb0uf4566uS for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:10:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x229.google.com (mail-lb0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 569C01A87A9 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:10:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id f15so19929590lbj.0 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:10:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bAcXPLNECWA/5stDHDMlJkMIspyVX4d2/Lvodynm2ME=; b=I8FyQX9MumxAFTx8zHBAGbjjOCZUjdcZv1TM/00mOhjwtPwwX4g9I7G3+7Th5ZLf9k vlxgM2zKP8QQvtkTGQTYvL8+na6Me3kFC7Ud/14Gn7fAcNZvl35rGaJUbm556Nw93gRm mUOHOejCK6ynSdNYjCk1kxCjPb9n7XUxLwGR0Dg8eNWjuPSMSaKnGEqYf4sB/dx9plnu YBCpKfub4gcC7pnZW9yxgnuztL7hkR/xysx9PWmmjPcYxRMfyv05rjdZ4XIAVoB8Esef MXdc2xA3CGr6di3+GwpsB9bFcGC6+RALtc3khNjDYnp/pMvNWdQppGYGWif2nflmCMn/ zmqA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.245.44 with SMTP id xl12mr9612530lac.81.1422465002362; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:10:02 -0800 (PST)
Sender: alangley@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.114.225 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:10:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54C84883.2090608@gmail.com>
References: <54C3DD05.6060706@isode.com> <54C7D5BA.6050606@gmail.com> <CAMfhd9XA5OkPHHnh19H8H6R7Z=XqJ1vWDG2-_U9Ej6_gO+KN4A@mail.gmail.com> <54C84883.2090608@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:10:02 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: AAyL2RzjCfEy5S0fgZmBOYoHgB8
Message-ID: <CAMfhd9VSSq4LCiWomGxCAF=HxQDE2hwcpuew99sF6sgYP8ygSA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
To: Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/qbagnPnLqMj19Gv_LbM3z_JF11E>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] (technical flaws to be corrected in next version of the draft) Fwd: Re: Adoption of draft-agl-cfrgcurve-00 as a RG document
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:10:06 -0000

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will revisit your email later. However, just another brief process note:
> I would like to strongly suggest first re-publishing your individual internet draft draft-agl-cfrgcurve-00, but now as draft-irtf-cfrg-curve-00 (i.e., verbatim copy, except change of title and submission date) and only then make changes to the resulting document. As I said in my previous process note (Jan 5, 2015, 4.42pm EST), this allows easy to keep track of evolution over time.

I've submitted draft-agl-cfrgcurve-00 as draft-irtf-cfrg-curve-00
(it's pending chair approval) with no changes other than the name.
Once that's published, I'll quickly follow up with -01 which will be
similar to what's currently in git: https://github.com/agl/cfrgcurve


Cheers

AGL

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email