IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-gcmsiv-04.txt

"David McGrew (mcgrew)" <mcgrew@cisco.com> Fri, 24 February 2017 12:40 UTC

Return-Path: <mcgrew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350D8129D97 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 04:40:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kuKH_fdhxn1U for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 04:40:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E37A41296CD for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 04:40:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2842; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1487940050; x=1489149650; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=bMdphacCpZv4y8WQBzUPC9gHb3HURQwB0Wsr1ZmSQC8=; b=LQHnFQ8ygXlkxxa4nzrBpW+mfFerKVm965/vR/NWKJyzmN3aoOLaBXTr FOqUvKpv9hwZ6SxdZxA1CD+i5ap5bOQ+HT/giA2SgNtPZ8p7yyO8oeM8T ctxX5mzuqJG2CNQA6JHj67vVyxIOn9yxKLWfFcy26OCPJX1I7ruLsPTsN 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CVAQDFKLBY/4MNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1BhgQkHg1SKCJFflTWCDR8LhXgCGoJ9PxgBAgEBAQEBAQFiKIRxAQEEAQEhEToLEAIBCA4KAgImAgICJQsVEAIEAQ0FiXQOrQaCJotCAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWBC4dGgmqEVIMGLoIxBYkGkxQBhnOLMZEWiFqKUgEfOIEBVBUYJhEBhjt1iRyBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,200,1484006400"; d="scan'208";a="389884664"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 Feb 2017 12:40:50 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1OCenxI013398 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:40:50 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-004.cisco.com (173.36.7.14) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:40:49 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-004.cisco.com ([173.36.7.14]) by XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com ([173.36.7.14]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:40:49 -0600
From: "David McGrew (mcgrew)" <mcgrew@cisco.com>
To: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>, "cfrg@ietf.org" <cfrg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-gcmsiv-04.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSjfICKnIXjxyGdEilsml5swIbPaF3LXYAgAD93AA=
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:40:49 +0000
Message-ID: <A3FAEDD6-6F58-448C-A3DA-42ADEC51AEA0@cisco.com>
References: <148786730667.20244.7762484121330383342.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMfhd9VumcZ76MJjx3Kr8gw6mbUJc7x_pPcSDR2V0Jiuz+sm-w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMfhd9VumcZ76MJjx3Kr8gw6mbUJc7x_pPcSDR2V0Jiuz+sm-w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.15.1.160411
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.10.228]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <E561DF416F500C4AB43EE05F12A24207@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/rI_Zk3sXcCVUv3WgXqK0FRCB4rk>
Cc: Yehuda Lindell <yehuda.lindell@biu.ac.il>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-gcmsiv-04.txt
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:40:52 -0000

Hi Adam,

One quick comment: the draft doesn’t request that IANA create registry entries for the algos that it defines (as per https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5116#section-6); we surely want to include them in the registry.

best

David

p.s. - a nit that I noticed in the Ack section: Mosna&#269;ek






On 2/23/17, 11:32 AM, "Cfrg on behalf of Adam Langley" <cfrg-bounces@irtf.org on behalf of agl@imperialviolet.org> wrote:

>On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:28 AM,  <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Crypto Forum of the IETF.
>>
>>         Title           : AES-GCM-SIV: Nonce Misuse-Resistant Authenticated Encryption
>>         Authors         : Shay Gueron
>>                           Adam Langley
>>                           Yehuda Lindell
>>         Filename        : draft-irtf-cfrg-gcmsiv-04.txt
>>         Pages           : 46
>>         Date            : 2017-02-23
>
>Dear all,
>
>Revision 04 of the AES-GCM-SIV draft
>(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-gcmsiv-04) has just been
>published. This contains only tidy-ups from revision 03—no substantive
>changes have been made.
>
>Most importantly, it now references a paper
>(https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/168) by Shay and Yehuda in which they
>give precise security bounds for AES-GCM-SIV. Specifically I'd like to
>highlight to the group theorem six (which gives those bounds) and
>section 5.3 (which gives concrete values of those bounds at a number
>of locations in the configuration space).
>
>In light of previous discussions in the working group, section seven
>includes some remarks about the meaning of nonce-misuse resistance.
>
>(Comments about the paper, including sightings of typos, are welcome
>to be sent to us directly; no need to clutter this list with them.)
>
>
>Cheers
>
>AGL
>
>_______________________________________________
>Cfrg mailing list
>Cfrg@irtf.org
>https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email