Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA
Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org> Sat, 10 January 2015 19:29 UTC
Return-Path: <alangley@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7931A0233 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:29:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HJf30XdZItfu for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:29:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8037C1A700D for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:29:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id gm9so19505335lab.12 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:29:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qj4uLDRUfJVRluUUSdaDeyOHQFPFYJfrBWsX2nBSYrk=; b=Kfpll3cZXaefpsdOwLYvcBB/h0wRvlspSELPJzoC98zZGmnmqtRPcFJMtIeBQMbfyG WpbdBFNJmWrHZk9W7M8ufTOdVHLnhIwZFLUlHGpJiXy/1yh+rDTLkWrqxxvtqNv1i5QO ipjYexlvCGADWrFPL9cd/5nzc6qPb6XepvyYfj5oWaMJcLNLcm7sCAmq6KmNuJRO7e42 gi2VYyYDEmwF/TvjVrcoKWQL2OCAs1CuW7BgS2+zYRfo5bYUKdtVFg1cF+85lhgN1cka 9Vw+4u2cxk4m0VXJet/eMu7GWzNCAglz1AmAndlLldzGinJjG3oDCPN1lININN4lL68x P4xA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.163.167 with SMTP id yj7mr28569727lbb.96.1420918165765; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:29:25 -0800 (PST)
Sender: alangley@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.114.225 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:29:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D0D6B088.5815C%paul@marvell.com>
References: <D0D6B088.5815C%paul@marvell.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 11:29:25 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: XWDcf3FXJSqAdVI9V8pdzEPS0Fs
Message-ID: <CAMfhd9XTQB-QjMpkW9PQ1e7NaV5jc56KfRP12i6WLaiNGqUyRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
To: Paul Lambert <paul@marvell.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/sGP-O88sg0VZjufDwsz54rRGUAU>
Cc: "simon@josefsson.org" <simon@josefsson.org>, "mpg@elzevir.fr" <mpg@elzevir.fr>, "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>, "agl@google.com" <agl@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 19:29:29 -0000
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Paul Lambert <paul@marvell.com> wrote: > In draft-agl-cfrgcurve-00 it appears that the ŒAA¹ term is not consistent > with the josefsson text or the EFD that both use BB Whether it works out or not, it's good to match EFD. I've updated the draft in GitHub to match, thanks! Cheers AGL -- Adam Langley agl@imperialviolet.org https://www.imperialviolet.org
- [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA Paul Lambert
- Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA Adam Langley
- Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA Samuel Neves
- Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA Tanja Lange
- Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA Adam Langley
- Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA Tanja Lange
- Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA Samuel Neves
- Re: [Cfrg] A2 versus A^2 and BB verus AA Tanja Lange