IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] SFE Standards?

Natanael <natanael.l@gmail.com> Thu, 10 September 2015 05:08 UTC

Return-Path: <natanael.l@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97A41B3A67 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 22:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6J95LjuK00lx for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 22:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5EC81B3306 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 22:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lanb10 with SMTP id b10so20124633lan.3 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 22:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZRPFQ1YSBqUEh4EcKzjVi0gAsmCTFqLkbM+XB8Zm+7c=; b=J2dNtVZVpIeYgYmuVfb5+zV56SK3KGJWdUXtUual6llZF1dd39kKFxtHrrzmVCYSci 0vrUrKR8EYQfDK690MD/9hmXpKlnnTgaZw85rMMCxDxWst8SE8ypvwH8SDiW3gu7LLwg +is1Cbqe+WU/UMzX9aKBtr1TybWhfxhi77MsSkZkKhza6faa+vA9rxOK5mnkhehG+Cuh kQ8IeQXVQL/yasjdXdzHGizhDwmzgHOr++T6LLt+gBJeqTCjCPjORJxtdi9tA+HmUCW8 nqQmh8RZHOoDE/3Pzkqf7HNzZMtFftlfV2yJ5w1eMiGDjsYOx9Kmukz1s0YPo6duV2jR UGoQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.11.163 with SMTP id r3mr33459173lbb.45.1441861731711; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 22:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.220.225 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 22:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.220.225 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 22:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <57D08D6F-CC7B-42F3-B9B2-513617851504@oxy.edu>
References: <57D08D6F-CC7B-42F3-B9B2-513617851504@oxy.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 07:08:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAt2M1_5CMZyTo3D7rz+8NEHb9x4PySnuPQD18JMkVy7UrrCzA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Natanael <natanael.l@gmail.com>
To: "Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP" <hbhotz@oxy.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3c7065588d4051f5d9894"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/sjqs8EB14-GSjvIANRlCaxzzYRI>
Cc: cfrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] SFE Standards?
X-BeenThere: cfrg@mail.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.mail.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.ietf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@mail.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@mail.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@mail.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@mail.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 05:08:55 -0000

Den 10 sep 2015 04:04 skrev "Henry B (Hank) Hotz, CISSP" <hbhotz@oxy.edu>:
>
> Are there any standards out there that would address the use of something
like Secure Function Evaluation for common Certification Authority
operations?
>
> As a canonical example, how about the process for a top-level CA to sign
the certificate for a second-level CA? Typically you might require that two
“passwords” be entered by two different people before the operation becomes
possible. (Hopefully k of n people in general?)
>
> Seems like we shouldn’t need so much special hardware to solve these
problems. The example I gave is specifically extremely low volume, so speed
is NOT a significant consideration.

Another place to look; https://mpclounge.wordpress.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email