Re: [Cfrg] [TLS] 3DES diediedie

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Fri, 26 August 2016 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BC412D505 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PsPs9VXp8Kr4 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x235.google.com (mail-ua0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2737912D501 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x235.google.com with SMTP id n59so150525377uan.2 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QW5mCSwNpSs1OuJC/gHtnhJ++e/IxMaNgs2sVU6LyR4=; b=Gp4rvjvT01+1H9iddg4qHVbhMD+wzMGNHhxsjV8f/B/RacpS+emJOHM5MFVdiX9b9K 22YywMguJNfy3iCfHYHi9bp3rXmPA+327vTJwKwz4REitVMkIVGhJJHc7x2FdKW77ajp Kq7tfaQJxZvPy88YbFgc7oz0b24zp9TkR3yqRJ2qRD7eJdRH7/LWt3dMp11smJhKO/qu qFsuSY+ONkBhsg9DwHioUkX42lV0nGl3PKkYlT83h3S2SxJBvoUCwaZ6IQgREUhUtgrE GH34Y9/mgsYtIY+mi3lhOsMiq4WNcejXCmYVb9IdHOtC7DAy4RhZ5+5MvAGPCV/gvwsx GNCA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QW5mCSwNpSs1OuJC/gHtnhJ++e/IxMaNgs2sVU6LyR4=; b=VMkgOuFaw5lGg4DCwsi5hgBm9Tz2q+Hyxss2iiUYwapLsuWm1BELVaBMUuSOTDkcmO ia/rdNEsb1U1WX5w1dQ/rHUc/ZDgwNVdZf8hKH7YTxlqZgCzjXUc4U7s3pVdtugkbOyd vOZFIwqhhS0MwH4XDCaO+lrLrgoQWa4rea9X8nv++OhGCr4X3cjHytrLE31rBMJZpU6V SFpXNCucM6myWIX3cnhG4S3YGkPTd5EBtaPjHiwbYHnV0lO2luvdT7G3kUuzaKBiLu3d rQoSo0g/ihBdT4Vn0CtodjjJp5eucGx3MaIbyOYT1guEK4vDTjHoGnaLWksbjxmvL1h2 fd7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOTwu2e3BT37GlLpFr6EqsMM/4Tn9jF718V90QPVbuRhhaiIVLdbaESyPI581Lbm7SmpE1GExT/TNXP5g==
X-Received: by 10.159.37.101 with SMTP id 92mr2944606uaz.109.1472234385250; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:59:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.1.209 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F42128A0-9682-4042-8C7E-E3686743B314@cisco.com>
References: <CAHOTMV+r5PVxqnSozYyqJqq_YocMKV06aAa-43t+5Huzh7Lo=A@mail.gmail.com> <F42128A0-9682-4042-8C7E-E3686743B314@cisco.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:59:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0cm-zOiqmE+9MjnwTfZa_WQxPv9RWGJeb-hQZqQ0r9P=ag@mail.gmail.com>
To: "David McGrew (mcgrew)" <mcgrew@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/t65kl28R5-JRUJmU1EWHEhF41eQ>
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] [TLS] 3DES diediedie
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:59:48 -0000

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:55 AM, David McGrew (mcgrew)
<mcgrew@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> Thanks for bringing this up; an RFC deprecating and/or discouraging 3DES
> would be a good thing.  The only good reason to use it is backwards
> compatibility, and too many applications don’t heed the birthday bound.
>
> There is another issue to be considered, though.   Most of the lightweight
> “designed for IoT” block ciphers have a 64 bit block size (and sometimes
> even smaller); see for instance Table 1.1 of
> https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/404.pdf     So perhaps what the Internet needs
> here is sound guidance on how to use 64-bit block ciphers.   Best practices
> here include both mandatory rekeying well below the birthday bound and/or
> the use of secure beyond the birthday bound modes of operation such as
> Iwata’s CENC.

Or use PRF instead of PRP for counter mode. I'm happy to check the
arithmetic if we want an RFC for this, but am very overcommitted on
editing right now.

>
> Best,
>
> David
>
> From: Cfrg <cfrg-bounces@irtf.org> on behalf of Tony Arcieri
> <bascule@gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 10:08 PM
> To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>, "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
> Subject: [Cfrg] 3DES diediedie
>
> This attack was published today[*]:
>
> https://sweet32.info/
>
> I bring it up because I think the threat model is similar to the threats
> that lead to RC4 "diediedie"
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7465
>
> Should there be a 3DES "diediedie"?
>
> I believe 3DES is MTI for TLS 1.0/1.1(?) but I think it would make sense for
> it to be banned from TLS 1.3.
>
> [*] Lest anyone claim the contrary, I am not surprised by this attack, and
> have pushed to have 3DES removed from TLS prior to the publication of this
> attack, and can probably find a TLS implementer who can back me up on that.
>
> --
> Tony Arcieri
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>



-- 
"Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains".
--Rousseau.