Re: [Cfrg] Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair

Tao Effect <contact@taoeffect.com> Tue, 24 December 2013 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <contact@taoeffect.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB191ADFF6 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:17:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.335
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.335 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36srZu4tDC8P for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:17:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a9.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaib.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A521ADFF5 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:17:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a9.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a9.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BBFB4E002; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:17:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=taoeffect.com; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; s=taoeffect.com; bh=dgi/QHgSh3UfhTjPY OMOwv/hVHg=; b=jDAufqWjqJ/751/Yz4HKfkJ/yKCzpGrLbssrfB2B4YMiTpVQ+ 3h+f4Xz6LU5CFxtkdv06baDq0S6cuFFIcyFToceHcrVDUSthu0xHbDnlF9lGNIO2 IM08Ms0Md0AslsclvVnZpXqOw6z0VNKrNJWr+eAn9wRN6GXSXuhY+9wVig=
Received: from [192.168.2.3] (ip98-180-48-204.ga.at.cox.net [98.180.48.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: contact@taoeffect.com) by homiemail-a9.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2E10B4E001; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:17:01 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0FB40831-74D2-4894-88D3-6346C9EB5099"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Tao Effect <contact@taoeffect.com>
In-Reply-To: <52B91AE6.80409@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 11:16:56 -0500
Message-Id: <9DC3E854-9338-4079-96CE-25A4B6A688C9@taoeffect.com>
References: <201312212237.rBLMbo5i016331@sylvester.rhmr.com> <5FA05FD6-59A5-40EC-A3F6-A542E37C3224@taoeffect.com> <31D844CE-CCC8-4A4A-90A1-064D7B205E13@taoeffect.com> <CEDB64D7.2B148%paul@marvell.com> <CACsn0ckpB+9GHHb37xJ6BrpK3SL1aPe2-_nPwbDZKMAjMFg0Sg@mail.gmail.com> <8ac4396af38c4be34935361ed36ca5f6.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <CACsn0c=96TPU5+WbkU=k3=S2r14Oho+frMVJ8zcZoEjXpYS9KA@mail.gmail.com> <e48e9ab7885ad9bd9c35def72ad429d7.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <52B7E1EF.80808@akr.io> <CABqy+so1weyHXKVLU0LPmv4nWg+E4VN_Z4uCapSASepf+LfQNQ@mail.gmail.com> <7376E700-6334-46A3-AD8E-1EDF9C67DC97@taoeffect.com> <BD34B825-0FC3-4AF8-8C1B-7DD51FB0EB2D@checkpoint.com> <9F2BED3F-A998-4D6E-90B1-481DD288C1D1@viega.org> <CE560688-634D-4777-84E2-5AB195DE402C@taoeffect.com> <52B91AE6.80409@cisco.com>
To: David McGrew <mcgrew@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Cc: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Requesting removal of CFRG co-chair
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 16:17:08 -0000

David,

On Dec 24, 2013, at 12:25 AM, David McGrew <mcgrew@cisco.com>; wrote:

> Greg,
> 
> please understand that, to the people who have attended CFRG and IETF meetings with Kevin, it does sound a bit silly to suggest that he is not a real person.   I am not sure why he has not responded on the list, though it is the holiday season in the U.S., which could be the reason.
> 
> David

Do you mean to say that you, and others on this list think that I said that he's not a physical person?

How is such an interpretation of my emails possible? I don't understand.

I've acknowledged Kevin's "realness" multiple times, in several emails. Its the "realness" of his name that I was just curious about, given the reasons already stated across those emails.

Thanks,
Greg

--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.