Re: [CFRG] Call for adoption for draft-wood-cfrg-rsa-blind-signatures

Ekr covered my views on this also.

I am not sure that this is the ideal design, but I find being able to use existing PSS verifiers to be appealing.

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021, at 02:44, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I haven't studied this draft in detail, but I believe that it would be 
> good for this WG to work on blind signatures, as they are a primitive 
> with a lot of applicability.
> 
> In general, I'd probably be more inclined to select blind BLS for new 
> applications, but there are certainly going to be a lot of settings in 
> which people don't have pairing code, and in those cases, it seems like 
> this draft would be valuable.
> 
> -Ekr
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 8:47 AM Steven Valdez 
> <svaldez=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> > I think it would be useful to have this work adopted and eventually standardized, various protocols/APIs seem to be building on blind signature style schemes, and having a draft here would help in trying to unify or at least provide guidance for how to use blind signatures in a more consistent manner. In the PrivacyPass space, this sort of scheme might be useful for some of the use cases that need public verifiability, where there's currently still a gap on how PrivacyPass implements public verifiability.
> > 
> > Generally supportive of this draft, and would be happy to help give feedback on it.
> > 
> > -Steven
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 5:21 AM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Dear CFRG participants,
> >> As a follow-up to the discussion at the recent CFRG meeting, this email commences a 3-week call for adoption for "RSA Blind Signatures" draft (draft-wood-cfrg-rsa-blind-signatures-00) that will end on April 9th 2021:
> >> 
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wood-cfrg-rsa-blind-signatures/
> >> 
> >> Please give your views on whether this document should be adopted as a CFRG draft, and if so, whether you'd be willing to help work on it/review it. Please reply to this email (or in exceptional circumstances you can email CFRG chairs directly at cfrg-chairs@ietf.org)
> >> 
> >> Thank you,
> >> Stanislav (for the chairs)
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CFRG mailing list
> >> CFRG@irtf.org
> >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > Steven Valdez |	 Chrome Privacy Sandbox |	 svaldez@google.com |	 210-692-4742 <tel:(210)%20692-4742>
> > _______________________________________________
> > CFRG mailing list
> > CFRG@irtf.org
> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> _______________________________________________
> CFRG mailing list
> CFRG@irtf.org <mailto:CFRG%40irtf.org>
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> 