[Cfrg] Chopping out curves

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Thu, 16 January 2014 21:40 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523741AD8DB for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:40:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pYu5g1aRRusi for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:40:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com (mail-wg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7B01AC4AB for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:40:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a1so3699998wgh.28 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:40:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RU2lUB8gK6l3K/DxuCf7qoMt+ru5QIdKeg5WuMNhHVE=; b=jzM2fhpKcLHuCcgWRXSL0U5lQoPYZf/qw1QxMuabEjFZ0jIdxT4uZlMUN3kJqcj1tE tWCpW4xhDpM1Qy5N92F/SqYhB2j+S/t4zolYh5J4sw08Wkzk189J5SwdQQoQ/q8eMhDy iJPT7GsFt/NCRV1b4ew1YgZoWNsZinrhfZRKbh/45wBg1CHpAhkhOnOKcaQHkc1RHvSK U4pwKHvjgBIJl8oNkK4wzgKNKtQVV73KG2xu5Ahee8uRS+wKpqG6O3sgqS+lbuiL2h/8 Rs5WFk0eDVqIu9N+Ilwd+s7zvHoZSfipM02o50OyioxQNHZ8jgQ7gyeVmsk4vQtQl8hH xmzw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by with SMTP id bz19mr10150217wib.44.1389908437443; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:40:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:40:37 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:40:37 -0800
Message-ID: <CACsn0cmJX2begH0q8vOUZhP2t3CFo_2Ad71Neke4EKejoYCPRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: [Cfrg] Chopping out curves
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:40:52 -0000

Dear all,
Trevor Perrin suggests that we only put in Curve25519/T25519 and
E383/M382 so implementors can focus on 4 curves ala Suite B. Are there
any protocols in which larger curves would be useful? Anything we
might be missing with this decision?

This doesn't really affect the rest of the text at all, and I will
hold off until I hear what other people have to say about this.
Watson Ladd