Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts
Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Sun, 10 March 2019 02:56 UTC
Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84302127962 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 18:56:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AgWGM5DVlHn6 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 18:56:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60BE212008A for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 2019 18:56:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id u68so995228lff.7 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 18:56:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+70s/FrxjUFD9qkdn4BQ4W3R67SG3FLltUeWgaSsaSY=; b=BnUmXVKFpSTRprFC50+igtE+VEMrGJ8EFxCmlmAaPWHmvgZt+gj+W2w3GjDSYzl0eF 9i+b5BAGFqfrnuMOzZe7NwtlS3OxsRmHWKWFc8CbYpbMP0tGlW0CVQhAYCEYFwjfomea uuLDoe8VRv69gNRbsRmZk8Qgnpmy0ZymqU1CwyHgY79jhkPs8Uh4ZKFgobweiIfJ/858 ixWv7qrnixJYZdoSkjEnwLEcjyHlIh/cQTyJrr5+CeKvcvwCg/lTcej1eIGX2Dl5/ZxO cnKhUXup2RKkH+uPcrDTwujWzUMeYFZrQtkfw5CEqTMN8VEQFgZu48k8S2Y4E4kVtOYG 6LnQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+70s/FrxjUFD9qkdn4BQ4W3R67SG3FLltUeWgaSsaSY=; b=Pl97OuNpipJEJyTI8+nUM7MN2FPobgAILJtjr2AZq2H3qJRRdu7n/RO2/o/a4OSaO1 9NmohqtpYFV7u5fafzfuLDxCSHi5oDUDykcYRlid7cNIQXD8ceb4FDNH6hEbb4XTIhd+ poL/kRCiy+rLlhI2CfJ51u1JQCpA4LYb0+XLxno8tYQ6xHMARIxe01pMEWEBiM4Tuyt1 OGzbMY6Wp8Nrrd8tZaRWMFd42XiQJuoVif39kOGjuNWyh/EWQKaaZyFT0vaJWvaMMIPP Y/Sr9CjlpbKb3TjUvcKoExiQT+y/B5L1GQHFlG3L8paNisupL7Q5Yv6oVB0Rdv3Ii0WP N+zw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWACkgnKRFY59ANS87290/G/jlMRl2fISjswnb4BTPu5SJDA77X luuEbwykBMPlPAglQGY0BHA+9AszXRY4VTxWyN0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwOKpz13brzh4jHwHKn68SxoDgymaJvcC8Warv+UBqLVHc0nDNeTxjTHDZHUbhlxZFZG2SceTlJHU5OD83blwg=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:2c52:: with SMTP id s79mr14089399lfs.32.1552186570362; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 18:56:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1d8de489fc976b63a911573300a431d4.squirrel@www.amsl.com> <EDCE0340-E79A-4464-B4A6-F539C694601C@akamai.com> <B536DE62-B202-4484-91AE-DDF7C3DD9503@gmail.com> <F5A25573-D7B5-4F0A-AE7A-7ACF9D613C9C@ericsson.com> <CAHOTMVJSazerng82T7LGZqQ9H5ODrLOacKKYMXrqGYJ42sDm+A@mail.gmail.com> <38FEBE5B-B60E-49DD-B048-A8A08EBF7FB4@azet.org> <C99F53D2-FC9C-468E-BB02-2BE4B4BDE7A7@azet.org> <F6D6DE1B-DAD9-4F91-9420-B32F7DAC1C56@vpnc.org> <CAHOTMV+v2dtG_eHA41Xi5_HnTVaCb1sygppe0JMHiYzzG3ZYqg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1903091737380.29170@bofh.nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1903091737380.29170@bofh.nohats.ca>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 18:55:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CACsn0cma2brnBEboqi94jx6ndAw=T_QGaSZ=FOCK73a9ZNDN+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>, trustees@ietf.org, CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>, "RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>, secdir <secdir@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000026d63d0583b499d6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/u3d8TOdpPydCigGR0raatnmVwQM>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 02:56:16 -0000
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019, 6:47 PM Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote: > On Sat, 9 Mar 2019, Tony Arcieri wrote: > > > Here is the specific wording he is suggesting: > > > > "Phillip Rogaway offers a royalty-free non-exclusive license to all > claims of the referenced patents needed to realize a fully compliant > > implementation of any IETF standards-track protocol supporting AES-OCB > (RFC 7253)." > > > > I think he's looking for guidance around how to properly phrase that if > anyone has a more concrete suggestion for how to put it in the > > form of an IPR statement. > > While this phrasing would solve the issues for some protocols, such as IKE > and IPsec, it is still a request that the IETF publish a cryptographic > standard that cannot be freely used. The IETF normally does not do that > unless there are exceptional reasons to do so. It would be good to see > thse reasons written up for evaluation. > > It would be problematic too if someone using an RFC wouldn't realise > their use of this standard would be in violation of Mr. Rogaway's IPR. > > I also believe allowing OCB for only TLs in the past was a mistake we > should not repeat in a slightly different form by covering a few more > protocols. > > Note also RFC 3979: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3979#section-8 > > Over the last few years the IETF has adopted stricter requirements > for some security technologies. It has become common to have a > mandatory-to-implement security technology in IETF technology > specifications. This is to ensure that there will be at least one > common security technology present in all implementations of such a > specification that can be used in all cases. This does not limit the > specification from including other security technologies, the use of > which could be negotiated between implementations. An IETF consensus > has developed that no mandatory-to-implement security technology can > be specified in an IETF specification unless it has no known IPR > claims against it or a royalty-free license is available to > implementers of the specification unless there is a very good reason > to do so. > > As the IETF has been moving towards reducing the number of algorithms, > it would not make sense to promote a new algorithm that can never become > mandatory-to-implement. > I read the above differently: the specification it refers to is not of OCB but the IETF protocol which the IP statement clearly permits royalty free usage and hence OCB is acceptable. > > Maybe it would be good to involve the IETF Trust in this matter? > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Cfrg mailing list > Cfrg@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg >
- Re: [Cfrg] dragonfly, was: Re: Time to recharter … Peter Gutmann
- Re: [Cfrg] dragonfly, was: Re: Time to recharter … Dan Harkins
- Re: [Cfrg] dragonfly, was: Re: Time to recharter … Andy Lutomirski
- [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Paul Wouters
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Salz, Rich
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts David Wong
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts D. J. Bernstein
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Dan Brown
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts John Mattsson
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Aaron Zauner
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Aaron Zauner
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Aaron Zauner
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts mcgrew
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Aaron Zauner
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Paul Wouters
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Paul Wouters
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Uri Blumenthal
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Uri Blumenthal
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Tony Arcieri
- [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working group?… StJohns, Michael
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Peter Gutmann
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Salz, Rich
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Salz, Rich
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… John Mattsson
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] ISE seeks help with some cryp… Valery Smyslov
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… Mathy Vanhoef
- Re: [Cfrg] dragonfly, was: Re: Time to recharter … Peter Gutmann
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… denis bider
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… Paterson Kenneth
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] Time to recharter CFRG as a w… Paul Wouters
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] Time to recharter CFRG as a w… Uri Blumenthal
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] Time to recharter CFRG as a w… Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] Time to recharter CFRG as a w… Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] Time to recharter CFRG as a w… Paterson Kenneth
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] Time to recharter CFRG as a w… denis bider
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] Time to recharter CFRG as a w… Watson Ladd
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] Time to recharter CFRG as a w… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] Time to recharter CFRG as a w… Uri Blumenthal
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] Time to recharter CFRG as a w… denis bider
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] Time to recharter CFRG as a w… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] Time to recharter CFRG as a w… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] Time to recharter CFRG as a w… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… mcgrew
- Re: [Cfrg] [secdir] Time to recharter CFRG as a w… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… mcgrew
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… StJohns, Michael
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Cfrg] Time to recharter CFRG as a working gr… Martin Thomson
- [Cfrg] dragonfly, was: Re: Time to recharter CFRG… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Cfrg] dragonfly, was: Re: Time to recharter … Tony Arcieri
- Re: [Cfrg] dragonfly, was: Re: Time to recharter … Björn Haase
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts mcgrew
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts mcgrew
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Ted Krovetz
- Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts Benjamin Kaduk