Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts

Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> Sat, 09 March 2019 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <bascule@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD1B1275E9 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 17:32:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJGrMWS952aJ for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 17:32:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22f.google.com (mail-oi1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B413126C15 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 17:32:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id j10so17350318oij.13 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 17:32:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BkO5y5lK0mJBl7dd4GfnbdGRtMeH2Xf/02HDz6r2WmI=; b=ITO8cUjmJI+5a9Zr2vDP2HBWOFO/+65BE35kjYbJYXNffxhCggNEpQ8NZ9Y8vxwdAb pMQ0Au5KVSBPwEeYQr95we2Ce3neiQHkMPE0GuBF/SVPRxpkonnFLidmBqgkBHlclhFb VyUAIHRV3+X++rOeEEXjqlW9JnsKxWd+m8zduJnYttltL5B4NCuMyj/rvaqJB7UCkKlL FfCTtpHBenymm3w7iHaXoY6cnC6gulSkXRn9/dNMXtOBYO64T6N6JAbycmpP8yRJptvK /WPrjbWsN/5aY/yBY/TY5zqdnqHgWtUx4ooQxRI4qQNVZMxnWiPHLS2klkOZT0Jfl1tv uijA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BkO5y5lK0mJBl7dd4GfnbdGRtMeH2Xf/02HDz6r2WmI=; b=R9VF9XMDZJiyHRHBwwVM/lWTyEkFRiW5ezoKQ2wXuB/H7lHwT3oZUuWr8O/2XTBLkh cqJ6V71OUNdohnnXqMeJ7Fsqm35LHdBn1MXiQWBBnideU/hwgam6CLQlCvgS6R2EJvS+ V5SMQLc8HKZMqZSvW+3g2Li5bYFQVg79m4AjU1TETcMqRPDcmgNKZGtUaXXbmpfXn6BW ZTscYXp5kyjk5dlu75WiKgqO+/J+XkCMYKvUp5GFSnFxPWYuTeVGR6XPIKanv2mNCLGM mq0PhbVTh3k2YRlufRaf4Tjv2cZI/XbiVU7T373nhAgUbBhFmQYvc87JUrLBFiBBGbjU HQQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVyQWy/LtXTiRQa5u4A3WH2RnvHYpOTA5GRShPqfnc8M3kiKdpF bRLgERmpUHKk7Q8FB51BzEn2y4YHjPmWK/Wgm30=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx9++hl7UI62rzY9neTgKiHs5e/ZCchl8mrst9wmRS0qaOnKIfH6sPZPbYs8ZJ32Uj7Cz56bBowuKtkmoynTAY=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:59d7:: with SMTP id n206mr10260368oib.26.1552095167734; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 17:32:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1d8de489fc976b63a911573300a431d4.squirrel@www.amsl.com> <EDCE0340-E79A-4464-B4A6-F539C694601C@akamai.com> <B536DE62-B202-4484-91AE-DDF7C3DD9503@gmail.com> <F5A25573-D7B5-4F0A-AE7A-7ACF9D613C9C@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5A25573-D7B5-4F0A-AE7A-7ACF9D613C9C@ericsson.com>
From: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 17:32:36 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHOTMVJSazerng82T7LGZqQ9H5ODrLOacKKYMXrqGYJ42sDm+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Mattsson <john.mattsson@ericsson.com>
Cc: David Wong <davidwong.crypto@gmail.com>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "sec-ads@ietf.org" <sec-ads@ietf.org>, "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>, "rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002169cc05839f5173"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/vBsihUZmSbIXlYbnQXEXjTbHrgE>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 01:32:51 -0000

Given this, and perhaps temporarily suspending discussion of the Jutla and
Grigor patents, I'm curious what kind of IPR statement would be needed from
Rogaway to alleviate concerns about his specific patents.

On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 4:11 PM John Mattsson <john.mattsson@ericsson.com>
wrote:

> Given that CFRG has already published OCB3 in RFC 7253, which was recently
> included in the CEASAR final portfolio, I would like to see the OCB3
> wideblock draft published somewhere. I agree with Rich that it would be
> better to replace RFC 7523.
>
> Reading RFC 7523 again, it does not feel optimal that the two slightly
> different modes defined in RFC 7523 and the FSE 2011 paper are both called
> OCB3.
>
> The OCB wideblock document seems to meet the requirements in RFC 4846.
>
> /John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cfrg <cfrg-bounces@irtf.org> on behalf of David Wong <
> davidwong.crypto@gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, 8 March 2019 at 19:11
> To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
> Cc: "sec-ads@ietf.org" <sec-ads@ietf.org>rg>, "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>rg>,
> "rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>rg>, "secdir@ietf.org" <
> secdir@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Cfrg] ISE seeks help with some crypto drafts
>
> Note that OCB was chose as a finalist in the CAESAR competition. Knowing
> that, it sounds like a good idea to standardize it.
>
> On the other hand, if I understand correctly you need to pay a one-time
> fee to use the algorithm in a commercial product? I think that’s a big
> no-no considering we want everybody to use good open source libraries.
>
> David
>
> > On Mar 8, 2019, at 9:56 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> >
> >    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krovetz-ocb-wideblock/
> >
> > I would rather see this rewritten to completely replace 7523 (and
> include its test vectors of course)  Would review.
> >
> >    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krovetz-rc6-rc5-vectors/
> >
> > I don't see a compelling need for this, but I am not strongly opposed
> either.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cfrg mailing list
> > Cfrg@irtf.org
> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cfrg mailing list
> Cfrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cfrg mailing list
> Cfrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>


-- 
Tony Arcieri