IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] RFC 6090 correctness

Tanja Lange <tanja@hyperelliptic.org> Sun, 16 March 2014 11:50 UTC

Return-Path: <tanja@hyperelliptic.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83291A00FB for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 04:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qUTznLHQFQOw for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 04:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mace.cs.uic.edu (mace.cs.uic.edu [131.193.32.224]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C13DF1A02DD for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 04:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 28797 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2014 11:49:52 -0000
Received: from pcdhz005.win.tue.nl (HELO hyperelliptic.org) (131.155.71.33) by mace.cs.uic.edu with SMTP; 16 Mar 2014 11:49:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 5610 invoked by uid 1000); 16 Mar 2014 11:49:46 -0000
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 12:49:46 +0100
From: Tanja Lange <tanja@hyperelliptic.org>
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <20140316114946.GR5925@cph.win.tue.nl>
References: <CACsn0ck+8Rhxc1_4bp9za7n+Pe5Oan755CoxBs1ZnPFuruG6OQ@mail.gmail.com> <28EB012B-C9FE-4CF4-A039-E9DA5ECCD787@vpnc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <28EB012B-C9FE-4CF4-A039-E9DA5ECCD787@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/vE6ObK_w8Mk-n-kXse-2bGqI2Oc
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] RFC 6090 correctness
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 11:50:00 -0000

> There are enough errata that it feels like the RFC should be updated to deal with them all.
> 
If there is an update I suggest to include Jacobi coordinates. They are
mentioned in 3.2 but not stated anywhere. This is the coordinate system
most implementations use (they often call it projective though). 

	Tanja

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email