Re: [Cfrg] Conclusions: poll about curve around 256bit work factor

Jon Callas <jon@callas.org> Tue, 24 February 2015 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <jon@callas.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483BF1A6EF0 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:06:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XJ637QHFZcbv for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:06:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.merrymeet.com (merrymeet.com [173.164.244.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57C41A6ED9 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:06:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.merrymeet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97316A6FDF8 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:05:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merrymeet.com
Received: from mail.merrymeet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (merrymeet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hh7diXTW4SOZ for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:05:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from keys.merrymeet.com (keys.merrymeet.com [173.164.244.97]) by mail.merrymeet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FA9D6A6FDE9 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:05:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.23.30] ([173.164.244.98]) by keys.merrymeet.com (PGP Universal service); Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:05:38 -0800
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by keys.merrymeet.com on Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:05:38 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Jon Callas <jon@callas.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150223212253.GB27739@roeckx.be>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:05:36 -0800
Message-Id: <DB4EA3F7-1929-4A9C-BBCA-0AB93B0CDA63@callas.org>
References: <4927ECAD-1E54-419C-A2DC-1D29BE9E1839@isode.com> <20150223212253.GB27739@roeckx.be>
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <cfrg@irtf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-PGP-Encoding-Format: Partitioned
X-PGP-Encoding-Version: 2.0.2
X-Content-PGP-Universal-Saved-Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-PGP-Universal-Saved-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/vX9zSuCDpuv0aG9TmAivKWouG3w>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Conclusions: poll about curve around 256bit work factor
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 20:06:12 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


On Feb 23, 2015, at 1:22 PM, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> wrote:

> Could you next time please ask what you want really want to ask?
> You've asked about speed vs bandwidth, which clearly is not the
> only thing people are concerned about.  There might be a consensus
> to prefer 521 over 512, but it's not what you asked.
> 
> Maybe it could help that you propose the question first so that we
> give feedback on that?

Hear, hear.

It has been very difficult to tell what the question actually was, with lots of things tacitly rolled into a single question.

	Jon


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Universal 3.3.0 (Build 9060)
Charset: us-ascii

wsBVAwUBVOzZkvD9H+HfsTZWAQgshQf9H3i/I7F/T+BOLGH9UbsFZ96xbELF6w5m
pL/LgEm9n3u8N6sH3pTY77YJL8aR8JPSSt1q+kh0tGXH4M1q8OTMnhTW7JNXGy7h
AXIPxGuD4uubQFouJ3hhZJ5lXjlx9vCwY+ZYrFDqaVdYOfniGeHwyLjY+6XAEX70
4sHgh4ldr43gDqs4MAWvFpn2xBF3sPdPp9i57GgtjehrVWI1xNqxOb4bQZHYC5Bg
PaXgNuzYMHg+L2c3HoRQmSrJB0ticab7WcXmvetXRdpbnRGmnHEsu6qoSl3nlyEi
68MNWqrTnJIEtmnFCLWrYCIdF+lrehkRBr3vIiUzY7nFjfhpctMq0Q==
=ruw5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----