IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cfrg] [CFRG] PAKE / Hash2Curve First Internet draft for balanced CPace subcomponent available

"Riad S. Wahby" <rsw@jfet.org> Fri, 10 January 2020 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <rswatjfet.org@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFAA120119 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 13:44:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.418
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C-xX1BmY18Qq for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 13:44:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw1-f45.google.com (mail-yw1-f45.google.com [209.85.161.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A0D412008C for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 13:44:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 10so1265707ywv.5 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 13:44:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=7ffws2F/F48Ha9ahow/kRIIMQRaoSH8Teb+gzmXwyb4=; b=cc272mqEkEFIeWUk/2MfJO4wguLW/Hz7PYZaBZSODpwml67BnsSW7yCkdGs6OTSW/8 9PhqMcv6TOpzqRMDY9HbDNz/KwZiVVZuKvM1GPFd7TEV5fpxm66XCoLs3mLS/fzp3ENG hpKq6/mZIMhpxTyijNtVpEg6Kqej5R7N7jHskC3+e3lPQZwrZuBpoEmHhlP+JzaBpUfQ lmXsLbJykBHgMBzEBj3qqXw0D75LTqy+/ABbDVrgHKdXR4sdmmTkfu0RvMBDz+cdFfKR N6uePG+sNsnkJisYoxPymNbWcrLEAV8ekDTODTx/4N90/ZSNH5PW+MlFD1mTkHUVn5TZ gP8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXsZxr9ADWYSeYuYX/KzfOHnNJPgL0Lp6sFEaS0/MOuKD/bOE4h 1EA24i8dsm3RHaeaKwhB6wQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxKqBYIO9sLUsGzsHiupAH9HNZsjHRfg9UoUwkc42OAJwiNzs5zfqg4M2l1NPBm0oKwbAOdWQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a81:7b0b:: with SMTP id w11mr4586557ywc.10.1578692659279; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 13:44:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (dyn-129-236-182-250.dyn.columbia.edu. [129.236.182.250]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a202sm1380204ywe.8.2020.01.10.13.44.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 13:44:18 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 13:44:12 -0800
From: "Riad S. Wahby" <rsw@jfet.org>
To: "Hao, Feng" <Feng.Hao@warwick.ac.uk>
Cc: Björn Haase <bjoern.m.haase@web.de>, cfrg <cfrg@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <20200110214412.sqnjcq2zecpbumuz@muon>
References: <VI1PR05MB650941DEC988A4E3DD3D7E53833F0@VI1PR05MB6509.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> <0A892720-D1F1-44A9-8E53-529453D566BD@live.warwick.ac.uk> <f51d77f8-11ac-8b2d-6ec4-beca3f66a19a@web.de> <3168DBA4-CDA5-44F5-A0EC-175E67DD446B@live.warwick.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3168DBA4-CDA5-44F5-A0EC-175E67DD446B@live.warwick.ac.uk>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/vhdwcbbale-8IKSqflXe99HAotY>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] [CFRG] PAKE / Hash2Curve First Internet draft for balanced CPace subcomponent available
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 21:44:21 -0000

Hello Hao,

"Hao, Feng" <Feng.Hao@warwick.ac.uk> wrote:
>     "However, there is no formal security proof of this function published"
> 
> The same note might be applicable to the current IETF draft on
> hash-to-curve.

The constructions in the draft all have published security analyses.

Apologies if this is not clear from the draft; I will take a note
to go over it and make sure that it is made clearer.

-=rsw

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email