Re: [CFRG] RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque-13

"Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com> Fri, 12 January 2024 06:24 UTC

Return-Path: <smyshsv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDD1C14F6B6 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 22:24:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.844
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.844 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 337zAQfGMBud for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 22:24:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw1-x1132.google.com (mail-yw1-x1132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C20ECC14F6AE for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 22:24:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw1-x1132.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-5e54d40cca2so50764867b3.3 for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 22:24:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705040640; x=1705645440; darn=irtf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ggNWQ+0PjtemeNNzuELpHVzCAacqk/vFMQKxtCHDuTs=; b=Ofe0mDVEoNTN/BA2mMc5MBK6sVDUDEP4vgjCxsZ5D90El1O075XbytkhtG421nTDK2 ZtGGFRXkOwG/eLp4ucOq5W426vB/rGgQB91G/q5faJi5Q76Xn1rk7MI/g+e8Vf5OP2Gv Rs9aKPwo5Qn0jbw3hRjUsH7wT4H2XdqvHRJhPIMyz/O+5EDcnkL95Lwktt/VD+ZCnmhF EeInCDDzORsKjbSDAS/MgEDhgmXWcZoQq33pf26WMJiUccIVDcZJNzpsugMo04z0PsL3 ZALKnDY/qW89qixn8jqAs65+YFRH7jHPN/+kvPEPDLRQ7+Drrvnl9ojYG/HjkKKEvrjx 4v6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705040640; x=1705645440; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ggNWQ+0PjtemeNNzuELpHVzCAacqk/vFMQKxtCHDuTs=; b=YfoaBEZdWbVebP1K1or+ZZHDF0XlJ4iCLUAbK2TJYIOTJ/779weazQHCLgQQU80exz fOYjo9S6LoC5ckkYKPtcC1VqvzQUeOKNMgi3ZkMQFl6FfOmHntvOG97uiii9meUlxeMq A6fTp8VhZk7zlMBWEg/yBRhhSXPcghdl5SWZ7rppqIiWsTx+s7vSMGch7/oeO0s5KOOQ U4wbgFRN8StuHNlf+d9I9qEuvTMbLQNLGaj+EinMglGUSn3EVGupDA3Nia1z9ujRqvp0 5YB4DjQpsIAn6huErUjWJA3mloK6E10/O4R33zEPb9TBXY9TBTUn3Q6QM+OOvhNPG4Lh HJOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YznqtKA9JVFi85qshSvkQinJJpKUzbqI+ZMamDUPPa1SbZJnL0T yrSFHIQ6VwtTkBqPUe2r/jQK60R05kdxQ/VxWU30B0cagYaH8Apd
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFDeCvQs1AljEei8upvG1YSXPbaBGDJDNN50yIzgc5syPuc8QKPsqsEEJys3GY4PG6K9xBnEAAsmxMWLT/C2qg=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:ae48:0:b0:dbd:ac49:223 with SMTP id g8-20020a25ae48000000b00dbdac490223mr172336ybe.90.1705040640314; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 22:24:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMr0u6kOrbwdHEDmmGsVYzqjsEbzBCCtGL39jckNbSWsEumOQg@mail.gmail.com> <957960E7-3340-463C-856D-1F6B208716EF@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <957960E7-3340-463C-856D-1F6B208716EF@vigilsec.com>
From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:23:49 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMr0u6=mUKNK8hnRL0YFQrkc+fXfR2=JA3Fm_78xPv95mPwMtA@mail.gmail.com>
To: IRTF CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
Cc: cfrg-chairs@ietf.org, draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b18fc2060eb9b533"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/wTPqFNFz2yoKSTxFO4BPrgAKJmA>
Subject: Re: [CFRG] RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque-13
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 06:24:05 -0000

The link to the review by Jean-Philippe was incorrect in my previous
message - here is the right one:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/32NURJRhj-6nNMINFZNTQkGXsp8/

Regards,
Stanislav (for CFRG chairs)

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 6:17 PM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

> OPAQUE was one of the winning algorithms in the competition in 2020.  The
> specification has evolved since; it has gotten better.  Please proceeds
> with publication.
>
> Russ
>
>
> On Jan 10, 2024, at 12:34 AM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Dear CFRG participants,
>
> This message is starting 3 weeks RGLC on draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque-13 ("The
> OPAQUE Asymmetric PAKE Protocol") that will end on February 1st 2024. If
> you've read the document and think that it is ready (or not ready) for
> publication as an RFC, please send a message in reply to this email or
> directly to CFRG chairs (cfrg-chairs@ietf.org) If you have detailed
> comments, these would also be very helpful at this point.
>
> The OPAQUE protocol was selected as a result of the PAKE selection process
> in CFRG in 2019; there were a lot of reviews of the protocol and the early
> versions of the draft, see https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection
> There were several important questions in those reviews which had to be
> addressed during the evolution of the draft in CFRG.
>
> We've got four reviews for the current version of the draft from the
> Crypto Review Panel:
> - Chloe Martindale (
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/kq4JClSaBUqgGjwBLMMRSsfgnxs/)
> - Jean-Philippe Aumasson (
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/kq4JClSaBUqgGjwBLMMRSsfgnxs/)
> - Julia Hesse (
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/Bwo7jab6ifEG7a9KiDkXhayFgkk/)
> - Scott Fluhrer (
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/c3IKNQDDqkUKxSvJXlRXITmsytA/)
> The reviewers have confirmed that their concerns have been addressed,
>
> Thank you,
> Stanislav, for CFRG chairs
>
>
>