Re: [Cfrg] Proposed requirements for curve candidate evaluation

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 07 August 2014 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DE81A0601 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 12:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vk0I8pqUZ_LL for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 12:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com [72.246.2.115]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278E91A0076 for <cfrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 12:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826A947590; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 19:19:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com [172.17.121.112]) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7412F47588; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 19:19:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from usma1ex-cashub.kendall.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cashub5.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.27.105.21]) by prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5BA80051; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 19:19:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.107.26]) by USMA1EX-CASHUB5.kendall.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.105.21]) with mapi; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 15:19:29 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Benjamin Black <b@b3k.us>, Michael Hamburg <mike@shiftleft.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 15:19:27 -0400
Thread-Topic: [Cfrg] Proposed requirements for curve candidate evaluation
Thread-Index: Ac+ycgsJu9xdNgs2SO66343RIz1SCwAAmbiw
Message-ID: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C71859CD7E2B@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <f9d9c886d08e4a4eb09c4a57584f950b@BL2PR03MB242.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <4EBC943C-77A4-417C-B29C-D18E00F1AEAD@shiftleft.org> <CA+Vbu7xEQzXBdc8R6YYaeu0bQSTUo93ppJp+cUJVr9WGs0sjPQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+Vbu7xEQzXBdc8R6YYaeu0bQSTUo93ppJp+cUJVr9WGs0sjPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C71859CD7E2BUSMBX1msgcorp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/yO732OnZ6NGsf_BsydD630DlKGQ
Cc: "cfrg@ietf.org" <cfrg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Proposed requirements for curve candidate evaluation
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 19:19:32 -0000

> This requirement permits twisted Edwards. What it excludes is using different models for different purposes.

And why is that important?  To reduce code size?

--
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technologies, Cambridge MA
IM: rsalz@jabber.me<mailto:rsalz@jabber.me> Twitter: RichSalz