[Cfrg] CFRG curves: yay! (was: Fwd: RFC 8032 on Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA))

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 25 January 2017 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29236129564 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:21:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jn0_NKaUzgbc for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:21:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14EF51295F5 for <Cfrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:21:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D81BE2F for <Cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 01:21:17 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2OC0uF3cC8Mx for <Cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 01:21:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.75] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC446BE2E for <Cfrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 01:21:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1485307276; bh=TtW6wap9ltF5MXT/gFSf4rDgvvg7+fqS6iwJWnlmSn4=; h=Subject:References:To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=phgw6pK+LzjkMfsqYdaBVVvDsc2iGVZMBThoL6KfSkMbHGpnaA4jW2mxjzaDhfjl9 /NUqzHd5ByGSNCPLvzHWes0Oj5EEtxqZqM7YUScqNuZ3YNZ+Opm8XNqUBzHKvhWHNi ugCCxQK3wD5HPqQuSWCufYTl9Rsn+skEt/BaUQig=
References: <20170125004758.D41B7B81105@rfc-editor.org>
To: "cfrg@irtf.org" <Cfrg@irtf.org>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20170125004758.D41B7B81105@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <937bbff1-853d-e0bd-c191-f63d2d61f261@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 01:21:15 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170125004758.D41B7B81105@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms020706070404060504060902"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/ySJ4X_e6GarnRjTXtwoIVoIMtQ8>
Subject: [Cfrg] CFRG curves: yay! (was: Fwd: RFC 8032 on Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA))
X-BeenThere: cfrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg>, <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 01:21:25 -0000

I'd just like to say thanks to all - authors, chairs,
commenters and all others on this list and off (active,
retired or otherwise;-) who contributed to CFRG documenting
and reviewing elliptic curves that IMO demonstrate that
the combination of academic cryptography and open-review
rough-consensus processes can do as well or better than
other sources of crypto.

And I really hope that CFG continue to be as or more
effective - this does seem to me to be the right way
to introduce and criticise new crypto for the Internet
community.

S.