[CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live?
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 20 September 2024 07:27 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62ED8C180B43 for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tji909J32GwC for <cfrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E09AC16941D for <cfrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p5dc5d074.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.197.208.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4X93r52jDjzDCdH; Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:27:33 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3776.700.51.11.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <DU0PR05MB9720F36FCE38A9477411FB9B836C2@DU0PR05MB9720.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:27:22 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4A43A49C-443C-4B8C-8795-021ADEEF733E@tzi.org>
References: <CAG2Zi20N98cxpgjfRe6gWw1SQEoux+5P3NhLBFUfUHk_udYeFg@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0cmLjjyxcKsiHio-Vu-8jo80FQ=aFtoO3GD69jC5kUig9A@mail.gmail.com> <DU0PR05MB9720F36FCE38A9477411FB9B836C2@DU0PR05MB9720.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Björn Haase <bjoern.haase=40endress.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3776.700.51.11.1)
Message-ID-Hash: TQ57WQVQGFP6CE34A2M5EDLT2M2A5TDY
X-Message-ID-Hash: TQ57WQVQGFP6CE34A2M5EDLT2M2A5TDY
X-MailFrom: cabo@tzi.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-cfrg.irtf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Christopher Patton <cpatton=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live?
List-Id: Crypto Forum Research Group <cfrg.irtf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/yeEkQ0INbHiXv32FD01xyGUM-KU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cfrg>
List-Help: <mailto:cfrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:cfrg-owner@irtf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cfrg@irtf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cfrg-join@irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cfrg-leave@irtf.org>
On 20. Sep 2024, at 08:49, Björn Haase <bjoern.haase=40endress.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > So far we have integrated ANSI-C test vectors in the draft. I did try to do similarly for JSON, however it seems that for JSON we will not be able to follow the “max number of characters per line” requirement > for I-D and RFC. You can use RFC 8792 to handle that requirement. (kramdown-rfc-extract-sourcecode automatically reverses that processing, and kramdown-rfc has several ways to automatically apply the processing where needed only.) Grüße, Carsten [1]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8792 "RFC 8792: Handling Long Lines in Content of Internet-Drafts and RFCs”
- [CFRG] Where should test vectors live? Christopher Patton
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? D. J. Bernstein
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Orie Steele
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Watson Ladd
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Richard Barnes
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Orie Steele
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Björn Haase
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Carsten Bormann
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Carsten Bormann
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Björn Haase
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Carsten Bormann
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Peter Gutmann
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Frank Denis
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Frank Denis
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Christopher Patton
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Sofia Celi
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Colin Perkins
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Christopher Patton
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Christopher Patton
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Carsten Bormann
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? // Sug… Björn Haase
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Colin Perkins
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Christopher Patton
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Salz, Rich
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Jean Mahoney
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Christopher Patton
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? John Mattsson
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Peter Gutmann
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Björn Haase
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? D. J. Bernstein
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Bellebaum, Thomas
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)
- [CFRG] Re: Where should test vectors live? Phillip Hallam-Baker