[CGA-EXT] (Others) comments on draft-ietf-csi-sndp-prob-01
Tony Cheneau <tony.cheneau@it-sudparis.eu> Mon, 06 July 2009 15:31 UTC
Return-Path: <tony.cheneau@it-sudparis.eu>
X-Original-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BF93A6B16 for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 08:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id faY3DSd-vw3K for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 08:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp4.int-evry.fr (smtp4.int-evry.fr [157.159.10.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FED73A6CFA for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 08:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.int-evry.fr (smtp2.int-evry.fr [157.159.10.45]) by smtp4.int-evry.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CA4FE3F3B; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:37:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp-ext.int-evry.fr (smtp-ext.int-evry.fr [157.159.11.17]) by smtp2.int-evry.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A81A404FB1; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:37:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pat6243.micro.int-evry.fr (unknown [157.159.100.216]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-ext.int-evry.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B3B90004; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:37:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:37:46 +0200
From: Tony Cheneau <tony.cheneau@it-sudparis.eu>
X-X-Sender: shad@whitebox
To: Greg Daley <hoskuld@hotmail.com>, Jean-Michel Combes <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com>, Suresh Krishnan <Suresh.Krishnan@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0907061627360.7522@whitebox>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
X-INT-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-INT-MailScanner-ID: 4A81A404FB1.A8975
X-INT-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-INT-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, requis 6.01, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60)
X-INT-MailScanner-From: tony.cheneau@it-sudparis.eu
Cc: cga-ext@ietf.org
Subject: [CGA-EXT] (Others) comments on draft-ietf-csi-sndp-prob-01
X-BeenThere: cga-ext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: CGA and SeND Extensions <cga-ext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cga-ext>
List-Post: <mailto:cga-ext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:31:25 -0000
Hello,
I (re)read draft-ietf-csi-sndp-prob-01 and I have the following (small)
comments:
In section 2.3:
ND Proxy resends messages containing their original address, even
after modification [RFC4389]. [...]
I think the text is a little fuzzy here. Can you explain in more detail to
which "original address" you refer to ?
In section 3.4:
The text is a bit light. It would be wise to warn that generating or
modify Router Advertisement message implies that the proxy has "at
least" the same credentials as the proxied router (e.g. authorized
prefix). Proxies might even have more power than "basic" routers, given
that they can modify/generate Router Advertisement, Neighbor Sol/Adv for
all the node of a subnet.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Tony
- [CGA-EXT] (Others) comments on draft-ietf-csi-snd… Tony Cheneau
- Re: [CGA-EXT] (Others) comments on draft-ietf-csi… Jean-Michel Combes