[CGA-EXT] Adoption of draft-rgaglian-csi-send-name-type-registry-01

Roque Gagliano <roque@lacnic.net> Wed, 11 November 2009 09:54 UTC

Return-Path: <roque@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C6628C135 for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:54:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GL+ln1x68PDJ for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:54:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C503A687E for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:54:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:dfb::24:225:ff:fe4b:94a8] (unknown [IPv6:2001:dfb:0:24:225:ff:fe4b:94a8]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D4A3084DA for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:54:37 -0200 (UYST)
From: Roque Gagliano <roque@lacnic.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:54:30 +0900
Message-Id: <677D2224-8AC6-4532-B9C9-31A986D56B76@lacnic.net>
To: cga-ext@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076)
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: roque@lacnic.net
Subject: [CGA-EXT] Adoption of draft-rgaglian-csi-send-name-type-registry-01
X-BeenThere: cga-ext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: CGA and SeND Extensions <cga-ext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cga-ext>
List-Post: <mailto:cga-ext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:54:12 -0000

Dear WG,

I issued version 01 of the draft with some typos from version 00.

As discussed during the WG meeting, I would like to request the  
submission of the draft as a WG item.

Referring to the question from the chairs about the use of SHA-1 in  
the SKI extension, AFAIK it is the current possible definition of the  
SKI in RFC 5280 and in the cert profile for SIDR.

This is not a security issue per-say as the SKI is an identifier and  
not the signature of the certificate.

Regards,
Roque.


-------------------------------------------------------------
Roque Gagliano
LACNIC
roque@lacnic.net
GPG Fingerprint: E929 06F4 D8CD 2AD8 9365  DB72 9E4F 964A 01E9 6CEE